Digital Breadcrumbs index            
    Words | Images | Audio | Scholar        
works cited

Belew, Richard K. (2000). Finding out about: A cognitive perspective on search engine technology and the WWW. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bishop, Ann Peterson, Van House, Nancy A., & Buttenfield, Barbara P. (Eds.). (2003). Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brandt, D. Scott. (1999). Do you have an ear for searching?Computers in Libraries, 19 (5), 42-44.

Burton, Vicki Tolar, & Chadwick, Scott A. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17, 309-328.

Crabtree, Andy, Nichols, David M., O'Brien, Jon, Rouncefield, Mark, & Twidale, Michael. (2000). Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 666-682.

Craswell, Nick, Crimmins, Francis, Hawking, David, & Moffat, Allistair. (2004). Performance and cost tradeoffs in web search. In Klaus-Dieter Schewe & Hugh Williams (Eds.), Conferences in research and practice in information technology (Vol. 27) (pp. 161-169). Dunedin, New Zealand: Australian Computer Society, Inc.

Cunningham, Sally Jo, Knowles, Chris, & Reeves, Nina. (2001, January). An ethnographic study of technical support workers: Why we didn't build a tech support digital library. Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. Roanoke, VA: Association for Computing Machinery.

DeVoss, Dànielle, & Rosati, Annette C. (2002). 'It wasn't me, was it?' Plagiarism and the Web. Computers and Composition, 19, 191-203.

Erdelez, Sandra. (1999, February/March). Information encountering: It's more than just bumping into information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25 (3). Retrieved February 21, 2005, from

Fallows, Deborah. (2005). Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting--but they are also unaware and naïve. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from

Fidel, Raya. (1991). Searchers' selection of search keys: III. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(7), 515-527.

Friedlander, Amy. (2002). Dimensions and use of the scholarly information environment: Introduction to a data set assembled by the Digital Library Federation and Outsell, Inc. The Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from

Gee, James. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gibson, William. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.

Graham, Leah, & Metaxas, Pangiotis Takis. (2003, May). 'Of course it's true; I saw it on the Internet!' Critical thinking in the Internet era. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 71-75.

Holland, Dorothy, Lachiocotte, William, Skinner, Debra, & Cain, Carole. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Huang, Mu-hsuan. (2003). Pausal behavior of end-users in online searching. Information Processing and Management, 39, 425-444.

IProspect search engine user attitudes survey. (2004, April-May )., Inc. Retrieved February 26, 2005, from

Jakobs, Eva-Marie, & Knorr, Dagmar A. (1996). Academic writing and information retrieval. In Mike Sharples & Thea van der Geest (Eds.), The new writing environment: Writers at work in a world of technology. (pp. 73-86). London: Springer.

Jansen, Bernard J. (2005). Seeking and implementing automated assistance during the search process. Information Processing and Management, 41, 909-928.

Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (2004). The database and the essay: Understanding composition as articulation. In Anne Frances Wysocki, Johndan Johnson-Eilola, Cynthia L. Selfe, & Geoffrey Sirc (Eds.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 199-235). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Latour, Bruno. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lederman, Doug. (2004, April 11). Google: Friend or Foe? Inside Higher Ed News. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from

MacDonald, Brad, & Dunkelberger, Robert. (1998). Full-text database dependency: An emerging trend among undergraduate library users? Research Strategies 16(4), 301-307.

Markoff, John, & Wyatt, Edward. (2004, December 14). Google is adding major libraries to its database. The New York Times. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from

Mellon, Constance Ann. (1990). Naturalistic inquiry for library science: Methods and application for research, evaluation, and teaching. Oxford, England: Greenwood Press.

Mirel, Barbara. (1996). Writing and database technology: Extending the definition of writing in the workplace. In Patricia Sullivan & Jennie Dautermann (Eds.), Electronic literacies in the workplace: Technologies of writing (pp. 91-114). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Moulthrop, Stuart. (2004). From work to play: Molecular culture in the time of deadly games. In Noah Wardrip-Fruin & Pat Harrigan (Eds.) and Michael Crumpton (Des.), First person: New media as story, performance, and game (pp. 56-69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Prior, Paul. (1998). Writing/Disciplinarity:  A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy.  (The rhetoric, knowledge and society series, Charles Bazerman, series editor). Mahwah, NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum.

Prior, Paul, & Shipka, Jody. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In Charles Bazerman & David Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/Writing societies (pp. 180-238). Colorado State University: The WAC Clearinghouse.

Rabinowitz, Celia. (2001). Working in a vacuum: A study of the literature of student research and writing. Research Strategies, 17, 337-356.

Ross, Catherine Sheldrick. (1999). Finding without seeking: The information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing and Management, 35, 783-799.

Russell, David R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.

Rouzie, Albert. (2005). At play in the fields of writing: A serio-ludic rhetoric. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Sidler, Michelle. (2002). Web research and genres in online databases: When the glossy page disappears. Computers and Composition, 19, 57-70.

Strauss, Anselm. (2004, September). Research is hard work, it's always a bit suffering. Therefore, on the other side research should be fun. (In conversation with Heiner Legewie & Barbara Schervier-Legewie). Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5(3).

Topi, Heikki, & Lucas, Wendy. (2005). Mix and match: Combining terms and operators for successful web searches. Information Processing and Management, 41, 801-817.

Thury, Eva M. (1991). An experiment in teaching online searching to college students. ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications Archive. Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation. Chicago, Illinois.

Unsworth, John. (2004, November 19). Forms of attention: Digital humanities beyond representation. 3rd conference of the Canadian symposium on text analysis. McMaster University. Toronto, Canada. Audio recording. Retrieved 24 June 2005, from

Vakkari, Perti, Pennanen, Mikko, & Serola, Sami. (2003). Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Information Processing and Management, 39, 445-463.

Wysocki, Anne Frances. (2004). The sticky embrace of beauty: On some formal relations in teaching about the visual aspects of texts. In Anne Frances Wysocki, Johndan Johnson-Eilola, Cynthia L. Selfe, & Geoffrey Sirc (Eds.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 147-173). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication 56(1), 297-328.


Sponsored Links


A Beginning
A Lament
A Challenge

Literature Review

A Crossroads
Research in Writing Studies
Research in Other Disciplines
Alternative Research

Methods & Methodology

Methodological Frameworks
Specific Methods

Findings: Multiple Tool Use

Everybody Loves Google. . .
Googling Graduate Student Style
Googling Undergraduates
. . . They Love Too
Amazon Remediated
Last Stop: Library
Libraries Remediated
Academic Resource Responses

Findings: Playing Online

Playing Researcher
Janine Plays
Adrian Plays
Academic Play

New Directions

Further Research