Discussion: Study 1


Are MOO statements perceived as gendered? The results of this study show that some statements are considered to be more feminine or masculine by the participants. The sex of the participants made a difference in their answers to some questions. The results also suggest that some questions had more deviance in answers by sex. However, when averaged, the deviation in answers by sex was nearly equal.


These results suggest that gendered language sexist perceptions are, in fact, brought to at least MOOs, and possible other internet media. Despite the opportunities of MOOs that may allow gender to be less visible (others can only "see" the gender through special commands or pronoun use) and more flexible (the person behind the character chooses from a long list of possible genders) it appears people still apply gender to MOO statements. Perhaps this has something to do with perceptions of gendered language, perhaps the participants feel feminine and masculine can be determined by word choice and use. These results suggest that the gendered language found by some sociolinguists in non-internet communication exists on MOOs, and it may exists for the same reasons it exist in the "real world."


The research also suggests that females and males consider certain statements to be more feminine or masculine than the other sex does. Thus, it can be implied that the different sexes have different ideas of what is feminine and what is masculine. These results imply that MOOs have not become an internet media that can collapse boundaries, flatten hierarchy, and makes social cues invisible as some (such as Gurak and Bayer) have hoped for. It appears as though gendered statements do not disappear on the MOO and people do consider some statements more feminine or masculine. The results suggest the stereotypes about language in the face to face world also exist online. In Study Two, I examine these language stereotypes along with participants' perceptions of gendered language.


Study One:

Procedure | Analysis and Results: Question 1, Question 2, Question 3, | Discussion

By Jennifer L. Bowie