home(r) > iRhetoric > tacit > collecting > the sophists > andragogy > use(r)ful persuings > requirements > reflection > references
Requirements
Paper/Project
Some students expanded their blog posts, their core concept videos, and their class discussion presentations into term paper projects. Some took on altogether different material. It was important for the assignment description to be open-ended. Students could compose traditional or multimodal texts for their projects. What follows are their projects and abstracts. Students presented their abstracts and outlines as their final. Note the variety of media types used to present this work. As you scan through their work, notice too how each is an attempt to do what Socrates is quoted as saying in Plato's Phaedrus:
A man must know the truth about all the particular things of which he speaks or writes, and must be able to define everything separately; then when he has defined them, he must know how to divide them by classes until further division is impossible: and in the same way he must understand the nature of the soul, must find out the class of speech adapted to each nature, and must arrange and adorn his discourse accordingly, offering to the complex soul elaborate and harmonious discourses, and simple talks to the simple soul. Until he has attained to all this, he will not be able to speak by the method of art, so far as speech can be controlled by method, either for purposes of instruction or of persuasion. (p.142)
The Phaedrus is persuasive, as Jeff Rice (2000) explained in his exploration of Robert
Coover's ideas about our secondary orality world moving beyond a golden age
of text. Rice's "Literary
hypertext" is an argument, like Plato's in the Phaedrus, against
a new form of technology: writing. Plato was immersed in an ontological shift
from oral to literate delivery systems. We are experiencing another shift,
from textual literacy to synchronized media delivery, and our teaching needs
to prepare students to make sense of how meaning is made using new media in
their lives. In order to placeshift connections between the course and their
contemporary applications, students, ironically, must first break down core
definitions in order to understand the harmonious ways the pieces fit back
together. Each paper and project works in this fashion:
Lennie: Connecting Post-Process Theory to Classical Rhetoric: A Tale of Reclaiming Rhetoric (letter & paper)
Janie: Pathos and the online classroom (& paper)
Time: The canons and podcasting (& paper)
Fawn: Private Bodies in Public Spaces: Rhetorical Framing of the Body Worlds Exhibit (& paper)
Barbara: Delivery and ePortfolios (& paper)
Kendall: From Sophists to Plato and Back Again: The Effect of Classical Rhetoric and Postmodernism on the Contemporary Technical Communication Curriculum (& paper)
Glenn: stasis in the upcoming national elections (& paper)
Cynthia: canons of rhetoric and tech writing class for international graduate students (& paper)
Joel: The Agora and the Market: a classical model for the exchange of knowledge between academia and industry (& paper)
Alison: Narration and rhetoric
(paper & PPT)
In the last few years, a number of texts on the end and future of composition
and higher education and educational and technological theory have raised
the general consciousness about the need for a different sort of education.
Consider Bain (2004); Bok (2005); Newman, Courturier, and Scurry (2004); and
Smit (2004), for instance. Some say higher education should be more fiscally
responsible, should increase learning outcomes and measurements, and should
move the onus of responsibility from the student to the teacher. Perhaps each
of these things are true. Re-read the titles of these students' projects.
Each sequences a core classical concept with a specific contemporary application.
These papers demonstrate ways in which the concepts of the course have shifted
from their place as higher education content to real-world praxis. My strategic
plan for this course in Classical Rhetoric--moving course content through selection
and specificity, applying public purpose, providing important choices, giving
focus and coherence, sharing, incoporating dynamism, including some entrepreneurism
and re-tooling of artifacts produced, and emphasizing collaboration--is the
outline Frank Newman, Lara Couturier, and Jamie Scurry provide in The Future
of Higher Education: Rhetoric, Reality, and the Risks of the Market (2004).
They share these questions: "How can the university or college move from rhetoric
to action? What obstacles, both internal and external, stand in the way? What
resources are required to succeed?" (p.208). While there are large, infrastructure
questions, courses designed to placeshift the content so important to both
teacher and student to make world experience the institution are a start.
|