References
Almjeld, Jen, Michelli, Allison, Weatherhead, Chelsea, Frederick, Kortney, Perez, Samantha, Germain, Julia, O'Shea, Mallory, Lavin, Meghan, Haas, Tyler, Pitts, Rebekah, Fultz, Troy, Fisher, Rachel, Michel, Peggy, Vingelis, Kelly, McAliney, Sierra, O'Neill, Megan, Stanley, Kinzie, Hong, Judy, Chester, Hillary, Shaughnessy, Morgan, & Steele, Brooklyn. (2016). The f-word: A decade of hidden feminism in Kairos. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 20(2). https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/20.2/reviews/almjeld-et-al/index.html
Anonymous. (2020, October 20). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about Scalar and our Anthology proposal [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, August 23.
Anonymous. (2020, November 13). REFLECT on the intersection of your group's work with others [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, August 23.
Arola, Kristin L. (2010). The design of web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
Balcom, David, & Tolva, John. (1996). This is your brain on the internet: A review of Stuart Moulthrop's Hegirascope. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 1(2). https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.2/reviews/hegirascope/review2.html
Biesecker, Barbara. (1992). Coming to terms with recent attempts to write women into the history of rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25(2), 140–161.
Buchanan, Lindal. (2003). Forging and firing thunderbolts: Collaboration and women's rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33(4), 43–63.
Buckley, Cheryl. (1986). Made in patriarchy: Toward a feminist analysis of women and design. Design Issues, 3(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511480
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. (1989). Man cannot speak for her: Volume II: Key texts of the early feminists. Praeger.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. (1993). Biesecker cannot speak for her either. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 26(2), 153–159.
Coker, Cait, & Ozment, Kate. (2019). Building the Women in book history bibliography, or Digital enumerative bibliography as preservation of feminist labor. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 13(3). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/13/3/000428/000428.html
Colored conventions project. (n.d.). Penn State University Center for Black Digital Research. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://coloredconventions.org/
Curet, Avery. (2020, October 25). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, September 22.
Desisto, Gabrielle. (2020, October 26) ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, September 23.
Digital transgender archive. (n.d.). Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://www.digitaltransgenderarchive.net/
Douglas, J. Yellowlees. (2001). The end of books—or books without end? Reading interactive narratives. University of Michigan Press.
Ede, Lisa., & Lunsford, Andrea A. (2001). Collaboration and concepts of authorship. PMLA, 116(2), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2001.116.2.354
Enoch, Jessica., & Bessette, Jean. (2013). Meaningful engagements: Feminist historiography and the digital humanities. College Composition and Communication, 64(4), 634–660.
Enoch, Jessica, & Gold, David. (2013). Introduction: Seizing the methodological moment: The digital humanities and historiography in rhetoric and composition. College English, 76(2), 105–114.
Enoch, Jessica, & Ramírez, Cristina Devereaux (Eds.). (2019). Mestiza rhetorics: An anthology of Mexicana activism in the Spanish-language press, 1887–1922. Southern Illinois University Press.
Enoch, Jessica., & VanHaitsma, Pamela. (2015). Archival literacy: Reading the rhetoric of digital archives in the undergraduate classroom. College Composition and Communication, 67(2), 216–242.
Fancher, Patricia. (2017). TechnoFeminist design. Computers and Composition Online. http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/04_Fancher/
Fancher, Patricia., Kirsch, Gesa., & Williams, Allison. (2020). Feminist practices in digital humanities research: Visualizing women physician's networks of solidarity, struggle and exclusion. Peitho, 22(2). https://cfshrc.org/article/feminist-practices-in-digital-humanities-research-visualizing-women-physicians-networks-of-solidarity-struggle-and-exclusion/
Frank, Sarah Noble. (2017). Feminist historiography as if: Performativity and representation in feminist histories of rhetoric. Rhetoric Review, 36(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2017.1317571
Fyfe, Paul. (2011). Digital pedagogy unplugged. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(3). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/3/000106/000106.html
Gallon, Kim. (2016). Making a case for the Black digital humanities. In Matthew K. Gold & Lauren F. Klein (Eds.) Debates in the digital humanities 2016. University of Minnesota Press. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-2016
García, Romeo. (2018). Creating presence from absence and sound from silence. Community Literacy Journal, 13(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.25148/clj.13.1.009086
Gaul, Theresa Strouth. (2010). "Sojourners in the Archive": Reflections on the art of recovery work. Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers, 27(1), 128–129. https://doi.org/10.5250/legacy.27.1.128
Graban, Tarez Samra. (2013). From location(s) to locatability: Mapping feminist recovery and archival activity through metadata. College English, 76(2), 171–193.
Graban, Tarez Samra, Ramsey-Tobienne, Alexis, & Myers, Whitney. (2015). In, through, and about the archive: What digitization (dis)allows. In Jim Ridolfo & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.) Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 233–244). University of Chicago Press.
Graban, Tarez Samra, Urban, Richard J., Nagales, Marcelina, Hernandez, Jose, & McElroy, Stephen J. (2023). Linked women pedagogies: Tracing invisible intellectual work in rhetorical studies. https://lwpproject.org/wp/
Griffin, Gabriele, & Hayler, Matt Steven. (2018). Collaboration in digital humanities research—Persisting silences. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 12(1), 1–33. https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/12/1/000351/000351.html
Gutierrez Valdes, Raquel. (2020, October 27). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, September 24.
Hartman, Saidiya. (2008). Venus in two acts. Small Axe, 12(2), 1–14.
Hayden, Wendy. (2017). And gladly teach: The archival turn's pedagogical turn. College English, 80(2), 133–158.
Joyce, Michael. (1988). Siren shapes: Exploratory and constructive hypertexts. Academic Computing, 3(4), 10–14, 37–42.
Johnson, Jessica Marie. (2018). Markup bodies: Black [life] studies and slavery [death] studies at the digital crossroads. Social Text, 36(4), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7145658
Joudy, J. (2020, October 26). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, September 23.
Kirsch, Gesa. E., & Royster, Jacqueline Jones. (2010). Feminist rhetorical practices: In search of excellence. College Composition and Communication, 61(4), 640–672.
Kuhn, Virginia. (2013). Filmic texts and the rise of the fifth estate. International Journal of Learning and Media 2(2–3). https://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/kuhn/index
Landow, George P. (n.d.). The Victorian web. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://victorianweb.org/index.html
Levy, Michelle. (2014). Do women have a book history? Studies in Romanticism 53, 297–317.
Lewis, Sarah. (2016). Vision and justice: Guest editor's note. Aperature, 223. https://aperture.org/editorial/vision-justice/
Logan, Shirley Wilson (Ed.). (1995). With pen and voice: A critical anthology of nineteenth-century African-American women. Southern Illinois University Press.
McKee, Heidi. A., & Porter, James E. (2012). The ethics of archival research. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 59–81.
McPherson, Tara. (2009). Introduction: Media studies and the digital humanities Cinema Journal, 48(2), 119–123.
McPherson, Tara. (2010). Scaling Vectors: Thoughts on the future of scholarly communication. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0013.208
Morris, Charles E., III. (2006). The archival turn in rhetorical studies; Or, the archive's rhetorical (re)turn. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 9(1), 113-115.
Museum of everyday writing. (n.d.). Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://museumofeverydaywriting.omeka.net/
Rawson, K. J. (2010). Queering feminist rhetorical canonization. in Eileen E. Schell & K. J. Rawson (Eds.), Rhetorica in motion: Feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies (pp. 39–52). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Reed, Ashley. (2018). The trials and errors of building Prudence Person's scrapbook. An annotated digital edition. In Jennifer Travis & Jessica DeSpain (Eds.), Teaching with digital humanities: Tools and methods for nineteenth-century American literature (pp. 24–43). University of Illinois Press.
Rice, James. (2013). The aearch for Billy the Kid. Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Cluture, 16. http://enculturation.net/billythekid
Rivard, Courtney, Arnold, Taylor, & Tilton, Lauren. (2019). Building pedagogy into project development: Making data construction visible in digital projects. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 13(2). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/13/2/000419/000419.html
Ritchie, Joy S., & Ronald, Kate (Eds.). (2001). Available means: An anthology of women's rhetoric (s). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rusnak, Samantha. (2020, October 18). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about Scalar and our Anthology proposal [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, August 23.
Rusnak, Samantha. (2020, December 6). REFLECT on our course experience and key take-aways [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, August 21.
Sayers, Jentery, & Dietrich, Craig. (2013). After the document model for scholarly communication: Some considerations for authoring with rich media. Digital Studies/le Champ Numérique, 3(2). DOI: http://doi.org/10.16995/
Scalar 2 user guide (n.d.). The Alliance for Networking Visual Culture. Retrieved January 6, 2024, from https://scalar.usc.edu/works/guide2/index
Selfe, Cynthia L., & Selfe, Richard J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/358761
Sharer, Wendy B. (2021). Venues and voices: Welcoming greater participation in feminist rhetorical history and inquiry. In Amy E. Dayton and Jennie L. Vaughn (Eds.), Ethics and representation in feminist rhetorical inquiry (pp. 218–236). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Shivener, Rich. (2020). Theorizing rhetorical–affective workflows: Behind the scenes with webtext authors. College English, 83(1), 42–65.
Solberg, Janine. (2012). Googling the archive: Digital tools and the practice of history. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15(1), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2012.657052
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.
VanHaitsma, Pamela. (2019). Digital LGBTQ archives as sites of public memory and pedagogy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 22(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.22.2.0253
Vaughn, Jennie., & Dayton, Amy. (2021). Ethics and representation in feminist rhetorical inquiry. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Waite, Stacey. (2017). Teaching queer: Radical possibilities for writing and knowing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wajcman, Judy. (2004). Technofeminism. Polity Press.
Wang, Bo. (2012). Rethinking feminist rhetoric and historiography in a global context: A cross-cultural perspective. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2012.657048
Wu, Hui. (2005). The paradigm of Margaret Cavendish: Reading women's alternative rhetorics in a global context. In Jacqueline Jones Royster & Ann Marie Mann Simpkins (Eds.), Calling cards: Theory and practice in the study of race, gender, and culture (pp. 171–186). State University of New York Press.
Wysocki, Anne Frances, & Jasken, Julia I. (2004). What should be an unforgettable face…. Computers and Composition, 21(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.004
