When making decisions about which technology training models to implement,
administrators should consider both the strengths and weaknesses of
different options. No method is universally applicable or entirely
without complications. Under appropriate circumstances, however, each
model can provide opportunities for effective, ethical teacher training.
Please use the information below to consider which approaches might
be most feasible for your local institutional context.
Courses for
Credit
Instructors enroll in a semester-long graduate level course that addresses
issues related to computer teaching.
Potential Benefits
Courses provide space for
thorough consideration of both theory and practice. They provide a structured environment for
developing proficiencies and reflecting on instructors’ relationships
with technology. Further,
they are institutionally supported.
Potential Concerns
Courses require consistent
commitments of programmatic resources. They also assume that instructors have the time and resources
to register for classes.
courses for credit | one-on-one mentoring | workshops | open labs | informal groups | outsourcing
One-on-One
Mentoring
New instructors are paired up with more experienced instructors who
offer guidance and support.
Potential Benefits
Individual mentoring offers
opportunities for collaboration and continuing professional development.
This type of one-on-one support can provide opportunities for
instructors to teach each other and share knowledge.
Potential Concerns
Because this method is informal,
it likely receives less institutional support and credit.
Additionally, maintaining continuity also could be challenging.
It also requires a pool of experienced instructors who have
the time to participate.
courses for credit | one-on-one mentoring | workshops | open labs | informal groups | outsourcing
Workshops
Instructors attend individual meetings which provide hands-on instruction
in particular topics related to c-teaching.
Potential Benefits
Workshops offer flexibility
in terms of scheduling, and they can target specific concerns raised
by instructors. They also
allow instructors opportunities to teach each other and do “dry runs”
of technical instruction.
Potential Concerns
Scheduling
for such events also can be complicated.
Additionally, the planning, advertisement, and conducting of
workshops can require a great deal of preparation on the part of facilitators. Lastly, they necessitate an additional time
commitment for instructors.
courses for credit | one-on-one mentoring | workshops | open labs | informal groups | outsourcing
Open Labs
Instructors receive ad hoc support from staff working in campus labs.
Potential Benefits
Open hours in a lab offer
flexibility and provide opportunities for instructors to receive support
while taking initiative in their training.
Potential Concerns
Well-supported labs require
resources and training for staff and equipment. Also, depending upon who is able to
work in the labs, the staff may not be familiar with the pedagogical
needs of particular instructors.
courses for credit | one-on-one mentoring | workshops | open labs | informal groups | outsourcing
Informal
Groups
Instructors organize unofficial meeting times during which they can
offer each other support.
Potential Benefits
Informal meetings provide
safe spaces for sharing concerns, collaborating on materials, and
trying new ideas.
Potential Concerns
The informality of the group
can limit continuity, access to resources, and institutional credit.
Further, scheduling difficulties may arise.
courses for credit | one-on-one mentoring | workshops | open labs | informal groups | outsourcing
Outsourcing
Instructors draw upon university or community resources in order to
develop technical proficiencies.
Potential Benefits
This
method can be helpful if a program has limited resources. It also can provide access to expertise that may not be
available within the local programmatic context.
Potential Concerns
When working with external
resources, instructors and administrators may encounter a disjuncture
between their pedagogical goals and other programs’ technical frameworks.
Further, access to such resources may be limited if
a high demand for them already exists.
courses for credit | one-on-one mentoring | workshops | open labs | informal groups | outsourcing