Potential
Models for Teacher Technology Training
Effective technology training for instructors can follow
a variety of models. As with other decisions about training, available
resources and the needs of the facilitators and participants should
determine which methods are most appropriate for a particular context.
Ideally, training should provide a range of support, including both
one-on-one and group instruction and incorporating both formal and informal
structures. Local factors, however, likely constrain the choices that
program administers must make concerning the ethics and efficacy of
different models. For instance, individual mentoring is most feasible
when it can draw upon a relatively stable pool of continuing instructors.
Thus, this model likely would flounder in programs with high turnover
rates. Fiscal concerns also have a significant impact on training possibilities.
Methods like formal courses for credit, for example, require not just
a time commitment but a financial one as well. They consequently are
best suited to programs in which instructors are eligible for tuition
waivers or other forms of training reimbursement. A chart addressing
these and other approaches is provided to help outline the potential
benefits and concerns of different models.
Additionally, a list of questions is included to help assess the training
needs and potentials within particular contexts.
Regardless of the types of models used, instructor training
can be enhanced by structures for the archiving and sharing of resources.
Such structures help to build programmatic continuity and encourage
shared senses of identity and purpose. Further, this sort of programmatic
development can facilitate instructors' professionalization by providing
spaces for the recognition and documentation of their work. Therefore,
a list of potential initiatives for establishing
technology training is provided to supplement the discussion of
training models.
Implementing any sort of teacher training is a balancing
act in which administrators must negotiate the concerns of students
and teachers in relation to program resources. When setting priorities
for technology training, begin with the pedagogical goals of instructors
in the program. Consider the ways in which teachers might use various
technologies productively in their classrooms. Such assessments then
can inform choices about training models and program initiatives. Further,
get instructors and other stakeholders involved in the decision making
process. Rather than implementing support from the top down, coordinate
efforts with those who will participate in the training. Also, continue
to revise and update procedures in relation to instructors' evolving
concerns. The development of programmatic initiatives should emphasize
not only continuity but also flexibility. Ideally, instructors should
receive support so that they can develop and pursue their own computer
teaching goals and share their burgeoning expertise with one another.