Part 1:
Aesthetics
|
Part 3:
Mechanics
|
Theme
|
|
Flow
|
|
_____
|
Font, buttons, banner compliment topic
|
_____
|
Author uses transitions well
|
_____
|
Site includes appropriate graphics
|
_____
|
Author strengthens claim with each section
|
_____
|
Author uses his/her own creativity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navigation
|
|
Quality
|
|
_____
|
Author includes embedded links
|
_____
|
Author carefully follows organized format
|
_____
|
Author's buttons all work
|
_____
|
Author proofread work
|
_____
|
Site is easy to navigate, makes sense
|
_____
|
Author uses good quality sentences (of
various lengths)
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2: Organization
|
Part 4: Portfolio
|
Introduction
|
|
Format
|
|
_____
|
Author successfully hooks reader
|
_____
|
Author includes a thoughtful reflective
essay
|
Thesis
|
|
_____
|
Author includes a revised expository
essay
|
_____
|
Author’s thesis has facts and values
|
_____
|
Author includes a revised Narrative
essay
|
_____
|
And a contestable Policy statement
|
_____
|
Author includes a revised Persuasive
essay
|
|
|
_____
|
Author sites 2 sources in each essay
|
Conclusion
|
|
|
|
_____
|
Author reinforces original thesis
|
CALCULATING THE TOTAL
SCORE:
|
_____
|
Author solicits reader interest
|
Break down of scores:
|
|
|
0 points
|
= author did not meet criteria
|
Proof
|
|
1 point
|
= author’s efforts are poor
|
_____
|
Author uses emotional appeals
|
2 points
|
= author’s efforts need much work
|
_____
|
Author uses logical appeals
|
3 points
|
= author met basic criteria
|
_____
|
Author uses ethical (moral) appeals
|
4 points
|
= author has done a good job
|
_____
|
Author offers a unique stance
|
|
|
|
|
_____
|
out of 100 points
|
|
|
_____
|
= Overall website grade
|