|
Sample Peer Evaluation of Rough Drafts
Directions:
Please use Netscape Composer to fill out this form. Simply go to
"File" then "Edit Frame" and fill out the form. This assignment is worth
15 points, so take it more seriously than past evaluations. I will be
looking for good peer analyses. When you have completed the assignment,
post it in your "conference folder" on the webboard as you normally do
your papers. This evaluation must be completed by Sunday, November 11 at
8:00 p.m., so plan your revisions accordingly.
Checklist
|
Is it
okay?
type yes or no
|
Does
it Need Work?
type yes or no
|
Comments
for the student:
Comments must be made for each
category
|
| Introduction |
|
|
|
| Narrative |
|
|
|
| Focus on topic |
|
|
|
| Use of the class readings |
|
|
|
| Commitment to topic |
|
|
|
| Organization |
|
|
|
| Transitions |
|
|
|
| Grammar and usage |
|
|
|
| Spelling and Punctuation |
|
|
|
| Conclusion |
|
|
|
In Addition:
Please analyze your partner's paper using the 10 questions below.
Your analysis should include a short, yet thorough response for each of
the following questions. In other words, write at least three meaningful
sentences for each response you make. Also, give examples from the student's
paper when appropriate.
-
What do you like about the content of this draft?
-
What do you like about the writing style?
-
Is the tone appropriate?
-
Does the conclusion make you think? Or is it just a summary of the
paper? What does it make you think of that the thesis doesn't mention?
-
Does the title draw your attention? Make at least one suggestion
for the title.
-
How much proofreading and editing does the draft need? Where?
-
What have you learned after reading this draft?
-
Which general statements or "common knowledge" can be detected? List
at least two that you feel can be deleted from the paper.
-
What successful elements of webdesign does the author use?
-
What rules of good webdesign does the author break? Give examples
|
|