Rod Michalko's and Tanya Titchkosky's very powerful chapter ("Putting Disability
in its Place: It's Not a Joking Matter") in James C Wilson's and Cynthia
Lewiecki-Wilson's Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture,
can force a wide readership to question the "pragmatism" that allows
institutions to exclude disabled people. In their essay, they analyze a conversation
they have with "Harry," a colleague who blithely informs them that
"the handicapped" are not really welcome on his home campus. The juxtaposition
of their conversation with Harry and the assumptions supporting his "common
sense" approach to accommodations successfully critiques conventional discriminatory
institutional practices - and by extension, and for our purposes here - discriminatory
curricula designed with narrow, exclusionary assumptions regarding "normal."
In other words, physical environments that need to retrofit with ramps, wider
doorways, and Braille signage, were created under "pragmatic" ideologies
that see disability as not normal. As Michalko and Titchkosky demonstrate, conversations
and already-designed spaces reveal unspoken assumptions regarding the place
of disability in society - its marginalization. In this ideology, pragmatics
is unquestioned; exclusion is unquestioned. A barrier is something the disabled
naturally have to overcome because "that's just the way things are."
By exposing this ideology, Michalko and Titchkosky argue by implication that
designing environments from the beginning to be more inclusive would do much
to make the "disabled" more a part of "normal" society.
This view is consistent with the goals of universal design.
<< Previous Page: Universal Design in Writing Pedagogy | Disability Studies |
|