Collaboration

by Trent Wintermeier

Time Annotation Layer
0:40
Screenshot of Watch, Fork, and Star buttons in GitHub repository.
Fork button in GitHub repository. Right click to open image file.
Image
3:12
IIIF manifest of Collaboration titled section of this webtext.
IIIF (International Image Interoperability Framework) manifest of Collaboration section audio. Right click to open image file.
Image
0:13–0:36 My assistance with a large collaborative project for AVAnnotate and SpokenWeb has provided my experience of the software's ability to promote collaboration. As a use case for AVAnnotate, such a collaborative project was a successful test of the potential for students and peers to work together to create a large exhibit. GRA Context
0:50–1:04 Researchers on the AVAnnotate project worked on documentation for creating a collaborative exhibit with AVAnnotate, and after reviewing it, there are complex procedures, but it is possible for users to create a similar collaborative exhibit. Being involved in the creation of this collaborative project has undoubtably informed by conception of AVAnnotate as a tool for collaboration, and I understand the software to prioritize this fact. GRA Context
2:21–2:45 Part of my assistance with AVAnnotate's collaborative digital edition project involved troubleshooting issues with authors. This included working with an author's images and videos uploaded to a contextual page. In such a case, the author shared their repository with me via Github, and I was able to make changes in AVAnnotate's interface. In only minutes, I could fix the author's project, they could see my changes on their computer, and then they could confirm that my work was acceptable. In this way, I understand AVAnnotate to be intrinsically collaborative. GRA Context
1:12–1:24 In my own experience with the software and GitHub, I've found that re-forking a repository is easy, but it can be a hassle if repeatedly required. I understand the process of forking to be similar to submitting drafts for an academic publication; making small changes and re-forking multiple times can be an annoyance for the owner and whoever the new repository is being submitted to. This requires a learning curve for new users of AVAnnotate and GitHub generally, but once the specific dynamics of forking are learned, each user can make this process easier to navigate for multiple parties. Information
1:42–1:47 I understand AVAnnotate to be "innovative" because there are limited classroom tools which allow for students and instructors to collaborate on a large exhibit of multiple audio artifacts, especially with little technological knowledge and for free. Access to software like this, in my opinion, promotes new and unique learning opportunities and outcomes. Information
3:24–3:48 The use of a IIIF manifest to create another project with the same material is not the only use case AVAnnotate emphasizes. The goal of the software is to promote the use of IIIF manifests in LAMs (libraries, archives, and museums), as discussed earlier. This will allow for the software's users to more easily work with audio materials. Until that point, it will be difficult for users to use audio with AVAnnotate, but hopefully use of the software will urge more institutions to use IIIF for their artifacts. This integration will foreground the collaborative potential for AVAnnotate, as users can more easily work with LAMs and other users interested in similar artifacts. Again, such a goal is far away, but it makes AVAnnotate an important tool for creating a future where audio artifacts are better accessible across digital spaces. Information

Collaboration at Internet Archive.

IIIF manifest: collaboration/manifest.json