What Writing Students Get From the Net: Using Synchronous Communication to Develop Writerly Skills

Students' Responses to the Gendered Language Unit

Overall, student comments show their responsiveness to all four of the characteristics of synchronous communication. The change of venue contributed to students' engagement with the discussions, the immediate response to input helped students see how their language use impacts others' perceptions, and the structure of the chats as "experiments" helped students test their hypotheses, sometimes with results that surprised them.

The responses below are all from journal entries written soon after the first or second chat experiment, followed in some cases by my comments

Responses related to Synchronous Communication characteristics:

User Anonymity

I felt at ease about what I had to say because I didn't have to worry about what others thought about it. 
I could say things without worrying about how others looked at me.
It gave those individuals who may be intimidated by others a chance to say the things they needed to say

One of the primary benefits of user anonymity is exactly what students have expressed here: students are more likely to participate, and participate meaningfully, if they can feel somewhat removed from the scrutiny of their peers. However, have students discuss these comments, and in particular why students in a learning environment feel intimidated about learning. Another productive discussion prompted by comments like these is to ask students whether they think the improved discussion climate in the chat classes will "carry over" to the face-to-face classes, and why/not.

Immediate Response to Input

I loved it. I had so much fun typing an impulsive thought, and watch it appear on screen for the entire class to read and respond


Responses related to What Students Can Get From Synchronous Communication:

A break from the classroom environment

I was so comfortable! I liked that I felt at home while I was in class. 
I didn't have to wait for a teacher to call on me. I also didn't have to compete to be called on first. ... I was a lot more engaged in the class discussion. I think off-site class worked for most people because the people speaking weren't the center of attention. 
It's something different from the everyday routine and it engages every student in the discussions

Of course, doing something just because it's fun isn't always the best pedagogy, but in this case students' sense of "fun" translated directly, in most cases, to more input and more engagement in the discussion. And, since the experiments depended on having a lot of text to analyze, increased participation in discussion directly benefits the students.

Real-life experiments

No one knew I was a female which was very interesting.  I told what I thought about the articles and people believed it sounded like a male's opinion.
It was cool trying to figure out who each color was and if they were a guy or girl.  I found it pretty hard for awhile until there was some dead giveaways.  If we had talked about an issue neutral to guys and girls than I think it would have been very hard to see who was who. 
When Julie revealed that she was Cerise, some people were shocked, just because they had a pre-formed stereotype of the types of responses that could be expected of girls and boys
 I was surprised by how wrong I was when you asked us to guess people's identity.  I did have a few right but there were many that I had guessed wrong.
One good thing about this chatroom was when nobody used their names and we couldn't tell who was talking.  It did prove an interesting point.  I guessed at least 7 or 8 peoples' sexes just by reading what they said

Opportunity to test preconceptions about society

I thought that it was fascinating to read responses from a "de-gendered" classmate, as if that person was a third, unbiased sex. This way, people were allowed to be more raw, without revealing themselves. I know that I was probably a lot more abrupt then I would have been in a classroom. That's probably because everyone was given an equal chance to state his or her opinions as mildly or brutally as he or she wished.  ... 



 
Back to Results
Back to Character Creation Unit
On to Conclusions