From chapter 2 - defining
"access"
Chapter two offers a provocative discussion of technological "access" that is
quite useful for secondary and post-secondary composition teachers to engage in.
In his section on "Defining Access," Banks states that technologies are not just
"the instruments people use to extend their power and comfort"; they "also include
the systems of knowledge we must acquire to use any particular tool and the networks
of information, economic, and power relations that enable that tool's use" (40).
The implication to this, he says, is that technological access is more than "material
access." His taxonomy of access can produce lots of questions that may open up pedagogical
inquiries for revision and change:
- Material Access, or one's
physical proximity to and ability to use the actual material tools and instruments
that are often thought of as the technology (e.g., the Internet, computer,
software, etc.) (41), is often assumed in many classrooms. But clearly
material access should be measured by degrees.
- Functional Access, or the knowledge and
skills needed to effectively participate in society with the tools that
constitute material access (41-2), might also be measured in degrees.
Pedagogical assumptions seem particularly crucial to consider here.
- Experiential Access, that is, the actual
use by people of the tools in question as a "relevant part of their
lives" (42), might be interrogated in pedagogy as one way to test whether
a course is providing some meaningful and relevant experience for its
students, particularly those who may have historically been estranged
from the academy.
- Critical Access, or the development of "understandings
of the benefits and problems of any technology" so that critique, resistance,
and avoidance can be exercised (42), is where many teachers probably
want to get to with their students since understanding this kind of
access develops cultural and social questions.
- Transfomative Access, or the use of tools
that creates "genuine inclusion in technology and the networks of power,"
whose purpose or goal is more than inclusion (45), is possibly the most
difficult to accomplish since it calls for "genuine inclusion," which
might be termed creative participation in the continual rearticulation
of the technology in question.
Banks illustrates in this section (pp. 40-45) how technological access
is more than having close by a computer and an Internet connection. Not
only is this kind of "access" arguably only one fifth of the foundation
needed for equal opportunity in the academy and other communities, it's
not a toggle (one either has access to a computer or not). Access to technology
is multidimensional and complex, an aspect of our students' lives that
should be investigated and accounted for continually.
-- -- --
|