IANAL: “I Am Not A Lawyer.”

This term is used in Internet discussions to disclaim expertise in legal matters. It says, “don't take me too seriously, because I'm speaking outside my specialty.”


We are not lawyers. But do take us seriously for what we are:

We are a collective interested in digital writing practices. Our goal as a collective is to provide support for teachers, researchers, and scholars working at the intersections of writing, rhetoric, communication, and digital technologies, focusing on issues of digital composing practices, computer-mediated communication (CMC), human-computer interaction (HCI), digital literacy, information and communication technologies (ICTs), and digital rhetoric.


We are also a collective that believes that it is time for more of us in rhetoric and composition, and computers and writing specifically, to have a louder voice and a more persuasive say in the intellectual property debates going on in our culture and in our world. Further, we believe that we must educate ourselves and students and also take action to protect Fair Use in a time during which Fair Use protection is eroding in the courts—and at our institutions. Intellectual property issues are gaining more and more significant attention in our hallways, at our institutions, and at our conferences—for instance, there were multiple sessions specifically related to copyright and intellectual property at the 2006 and 2007 Conferences on College Composition and Communication (in Chicago, Illinois, and in New York, New York); see, also, the special issues of Computers and Composition (Gurak & Johnson-Eilola, 1998) and Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy (“Copywrite, Plagiarism, Intellectual Property,” 1998) devoted to intellectual property.


In the following webtext, we provide a copyleftist manifesto that argues for a view of intellectual property that protects Fair Use, and that privileges free and open use over profits and persecution. We offer our own media pieces and our reflections as composers of those pieces as illustration of the tenets we articulate. Asterisks (asterisk) within the text indicate notes and brief literature reviews presented within popup windows (you thus may wish to turn off your popup blockers before you read on).


We write this at a time in which writing is in the midst of a massive paradigm shift: from an older view of writing as alphabetic text on paper, intended for print distribution, to an emergent view of writing as weaving digital media for distribution across networked spaces, for various audiences engaged in different types of reading.popup



Copyright Issues in Digital Spaces

We focus in this piece on copyright issues for four main reasons.

What we are not focusing on in this piece are the debates surrounding the ability of individual authors and artists to make a living producing and selling their work. What we are focusing on is the agency and action writing teachers can take in a world of media monopoly.popup


We are also not focusing on a fair and balanced approach to copyright issue. Have no doubt that what we offer here is a manifesto. Because our debates are situated in and framed by the ways we talk about what we do as technorhetoricians, we have to rethink our terms rhetorically, culturally, and historically. We need to understand which old paradigms of copyright still apply, and also decide which don’t. The current copyright laws are having a negative effect on creativity, criticism, and innovation in digital media.popup



>> next: tenets and values >>

casey's piece

Casey's Work

adam's piece

Adam's Work

grace's piece

Grace's Work

amy's piece

Amy's Work

jason's piece

Jason's Work

matt's piece

Matt's Work