: Glossary : About the Author : Acknowledgements


Androutsellis-Theotokis, S., & Spinellis, D. (2004) A Survey of Peer-to-Peer Content Distribution Technologies. Athens University of Economics and Business ACM Computing Surveys, 4(36), 335–371.

Band, J. (2005). The Grokster Scorecard. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster.

Barker, D. (2005). Defining the Contours of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: The Growing Body of Case Law Surrounding the DMCA. Berkeley Technology Law Journal Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20, 47-63.

Bowrey, K. (2005). Law & Internet Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brockmann, R. J. (1998). From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century: Explorations in a History of Technical Communication in the United States. Creskill, NJ: Hampton. 

Brockmann, R. J. (1999). Oliver Evans and his antebellum wrestling with theoretical arrangement. In Kynell, T., & Moran, G. (Ed.) Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication. (pp.63-89). Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Creative Commons. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.creativecommons.org

CWRU Authorship Collective. (2003). Crazy Horse. Retrieved January 13, 2006, from http://home.cwru.edu/~ijd3/authorship/crazyhorse.html.

DeVoss, D., Cushman, E., & Grabill, J. (2005). Infrastructure and composing: The when of new-media writing. College Composition and Communication, 57(1), 14-44.

DeVoss, D., & Porter, J. (2006). Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as a new ethic of digital delivery. Computers and Composition, 23, 178-210.

Digital Millennium Copyright Act. (2006, June 4). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved June 7, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act&oldid=56899882.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf.

DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions. (n.d.). Chilling Effects Clearing House. Retrieved June 6, 2006, fromhttp://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/.

Dornsife, R. (2006). Coming to (digital) terms: The work of art in the age of non-mechanical reproduction. Radical Pedagogy, 8(1). Retrieved March 9, 2006, from http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue8_1/dornsife.html.

Duffy, J. (September 26, 2005). Groups try to chart future of IP nets. Network World. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/092605-ngn.html.

Durack, K. (1997). Gender, technology, and the history of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, 249-60.

Durack, K. (2001). Research opportunities in the US Patent Record. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 15(4), 490-510. 

Extended Background on the Negotiation Process for the Fair Use Guidelines. (2002). Indiana University. Retrieved April 22, 2005, from http://www.indiana.edu/~ccumc/copyright/extend.html.

Eyman, Doug. (November 11, 2005). Personal email.

Galin, J. & Latchaw, J. (1997). Heterotopic Spaces Online: A New Paradigm for Academic Scholarship and Publication. Kairos, 3(1), Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/binder2.html?coverweb/galin/index.htm.

Gurak, L. (2004). Technical Communication and Ethics in the Age of the Internet. In Day, M., & Lipson, C. (Eds.) Technical Communication and the World Wide Web. (pp. 209-221). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

Gurak, L. & Johnson-Eilola, J. (Ed.). (1998). Computers and Composition [Special issue: Intellectual property]. 15(2).

Heins, M. & Beckles, T. (December 2005). Will Fair Use Survive? Free Expression in the Age of Copyright Control. Free Expression Policy Project Web site. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/fairuseflyer.html.

Herrington, T. (1997). The unseen "other" of intellectual property law. Kairos 3(1), Retreived June 12, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/binder2.html?coverweb/ty/kip.html.

Herrington, T. (1998). The interdependence of fair use and the first amendment. Computers and Composition, 15(2), 125-143. 

Hesse, D. (2005). Who owns writing? College Composition and Communication. 57(2), 335-357. (Video available: http://inventio.us/ccc/archives/2005/12/16_douglas_d_he.html

International Telecommunications Union. (2006). Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.itu.int/home/.

The Internet Engineering Task Force. (n.d.). Retrieved July 13, 2006 from http://www.ietf.org/.

Johnson-Eilola, J. (1997) Intellectual Property: Questions and Answers. Kairos 3(1), Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/binder2.html?coverweb/johndan.html.

"Kairos: How Can I Contribute?" (n.d.). Kairos. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/cfht.htm.

Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

Lessig, L. (2004). Free Culture How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.

Limitations on liability relating to material online. (August 1, 2005). U.S. Code, Section 512. Retrieved June 12, 2006 from http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-.html.

Logie, John. (2005). Parsing codes: intellectual property, technical communication, and the World Wide Web. In Day, M., & Lipson, C. (Eds.), Technical Communication and the World Wide Web (pp. 223-241). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lunsford, A., Rickly, R., Salvo, M. & West, S. (1996). What matters who writes? What matters who responds? Issues of ownership in the writing classroom. Kairos 1(1). Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.1/binder.html?features/lunsford/title.html.

Lunsford, A. (1999). Rhetoric, feminism, and the politics of textual ownership. College English, 61(5), 1-16. 

Lunsford, A. (2000). Authorship and intellectual property. In Shamoon, L., Howard, R., Jamieson, S. & Schwegler, R. (Eds.), Coming of Age: The Advanced Writing Curriculum (pp. 156-68). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook/Heinemann.

Meserve, J. (August 29, 2005). P2P traffic still dominates the 'Net. Network World, Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/082905-p2p.html

MSU's University Relations Fair Use Guidelines. (1976). Retrieved March 7, 2005, from http://www.ur.msu.edu/snav/136/page.htm.

Next Generation Internet Conference. (2006). Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.ngncon.com/.

Porter, J. (2005). The chilling of digital information: Technical communicators as public advocates. In Day, M., & Lipson, C. (Eds.), Technical Communication and the World Wide Web (pp. 243-259). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Porter, J. & Rife, M. (2005). WIDE Paper #1 MGM v. Grokster: Implications for educators and writing teachers. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.wide.msu.edu/widepapers/grokster/.

Rehberger, D. (1997). The censoring of project #17: Hypertext bodies and censorship. Kairos 2(2), Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/2.2/binder2.html?coverweb/17/17.html.

Star, S. & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111-135.

Valenti, J. (2003, March 13). Valenti Calls on Congress to Battle Theft of Intellectual Property, Cites Role of Organized Crime in Piracy Abroad. Press Release. Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://www.mpaa.org/jack/2003/2003_03_13A.htm.

WIDE Research Center Collective. (2005). Why teach digital writing? Kairos 10(1), Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/10.1/binder2.html?coverweb/wide/index.html.

Wu, T. (2003). When code isn't law. Virginia Law Review, 89(4), 679-751.

Yu, P. (2004). Currents and Crosscurrents in the International Intellectual Property Regime. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 38, 323-443. Retrieved June 12, 2006 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=578572.

Cases Cited

A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001). Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/239_F3d_1004.htm

Brief of IEEE-USA as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party. In the Supreme Court of the United States, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc, et al, v. Grokster, Ltd, et al. (2005). Retrieved July 13, 2006 from http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/.

Ellison v. Robertson. 357 F.3d 1072, 2004 US App. LEXIS 2074 (9th Cir. 2004).

Hendrickson v. Amazon.com. 298 F. Supp. 2d 914, 917, 2006 US App. LEXIS 12720 (C.D. Cal. 2003).

In re: Aimster Copyright Litigation. 334 F.3d 643 (7th Circuit, 2003)

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Grokster, ltd., et al. 545 U.S.____(2005). Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/.

Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. 464 U.S. 417 (1984).