Reading the Archives:
Ten Years on Nonlinear (Kairos) History

Home
Jim Kalmbach

Sorting the Webtexts

If you have just looked ahead to the table on this page and wondered what the names mean, return to the previous section for definitions.

Having categorized the hypertexts, I next set out to do a year-by-year count of each type of hypertext that had been published in the CoverWeb and Feature sections of Kairos.() It was a truly exhausting task. Many webtexts combined a number of different organizing schemes. For example, a linear hypertext may use anchors to link to different spots on a single page, and a matrix hypertext might use sequential navigation between nodes within that topic. Complex websites usually combined multiple forms of hypertextual organization. Having come this far, however, I refused to quit and decided that I could identity a primary form of navigation for each text. This form was either the first encountered, the biggest, or it linked the primary threads of the argument. I only sorted by these primary forms of navigation and did not attempt to tally the other navigational forms that supported a webtext. Here are the numbers:

Table 1: Ten Years of Hypertext in Kairos.

 

VL 1
1996

VL 2
1997

VL 3
1998

VL 4
1999

VL 5
2000

VL 6
2001

VL 7
2002

VL 8
2003

VL 9
2004/5

Vl10
2005/6

Total

Linear .14 /4 .11 /2 .39 /9 .11 /1 0 .51 /18 .20 /13 0 0 0 .20 /47
Menu 0 .17 /3 .04 /1 .11 /1 .53 /10 .11 /4 .24 /16 .08 /1 .45 /5 .55 /6 .20 /47
Sequential .31 /9 .12 /2 .17 /4 .33 /3 .16 /3 .14 /5 .20 /13 .17 /2 .09 /1 .18 /2 .19 /44
Matrix .14 /4 .33 /6 .13 /3 .22 /2 .26 /5 .09 /3 .12 /8 .17 /2 .36 /4 .18 /2 .17/39
Looping .31 /9 .11 /2 .17 /4 .11 /1 0 .03 /1 .18 /12 .08 /1 0 0 .13/30
Exploratory  .10 /3 .17 /3 .04 /1 .11 /1 .05 /1 .09 /3 .03 /2 .08 /1 0 0 .06/15
Multi-Window 0 0 .03 /1 0 0 .03 /1 .03 /2 0 0 .09 /1 .02 /5
Timeline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .24 /3 .09 /1 0 .02 /4
Total 29 18 23 9 19 35 66 10 11 11 231

The first number is the percent of hypertexts in the category. The second number (after the slash) is the actual number of hypertexts found.

What Do these Numbers Suggest?
Keeping in mind that I am looking for large trends rather than statistical inferences, here is what I found:

  • Although linear, one-page hypertexts were tied with menu hypertexts as the most common form of webtext published in Kairos, 40 of the 47 linear hypertexts (85%) are from volumes 3, 6, and 7, and no doubt reflect editorial decisions that were specific to those volumes.
  • Although exploratory hypertexts are rare, they appear consistently in every volume until 9, and will no doubt continue to appear as interactive game-like elements appear more frequently in Kairos texts. The idea of hypertext as exploration has a strong hold on our imagination as a field.
  • The five most popular forms of hypertext—linear, menu, sequential, matrix, and looping—appear in relatively similar frequency (within 10 points of each other), which again speaks to the amazing diversity and creativity of Kairos texts.
  • While overall frequencies may be similar, there are some clear historical trends:
    • Linear hypertexts have not appeared in the last three volumes of Kairos and are unlikely to make a comeback.
    • With the exception of volume 7, looping hypertexts appear largely in Kairos' early years. In volume 1, looping was extremely popular (31% of the webtexts), but the form has since fallen out of favor, and that is a good thing. Forcing readers to constantly loop back to a starting page in order to progress through a website is just plain mean, and pages that embed links inside of an organizing narrative are only slightly more effective than raw links lists. It is very easy to lose one's way with either approach.
    • Matrixed hypertexts were more popular in early issues of Kairos while menued approaches now dominate.
  • Multi-windowed hypertexts, first appearing in 1998, are fairly rare. As a field, we have yet to come to an agreement about how to productively use multiple changing windows of content in a webtext, although Joyce Walker's recent piece goes a long way in this direction.
  • Timeline hypertexts built using Flash, Director, iMovie, and so on, are a new phenomena in Kairos and are likely to continue to appear though probably not in large numbers given the skills, the hardware, and the software needed to produce timeline-based scholarship. Although there are notable exceptions, Kairos authors tend to be pretty conservative when it comes to incorporating media elements into their webtexts. In the first six volumes of Kairos, only 14% of the webtexts used graphic headers (that number, however, has increased sharply in recent years). Similarly, video, Flash, and sound only started to appear in any frequency in 2002 and beyond. So, while you would expect continued use of sophisticated visual and aural elements in Kairos texts, I doubt there will be a massive migration to the timeline as a central organizing strategy.

What do these trends mean? The next section reflects on the significance of these numbers.

 

Navigation
You are almost done. Continue to The Three Ages of Kairos.