If the self in cyberspace realizes a Möbius strip topology it is because space has collapsed and the subject with/in it—the posthuman—has been reduced to a point of view so that only his “consciousness moves through the screen [. . .] leaving behind the body as an unoccupied shell” (Hayles 38). Metaphorizing the posthuman as a singularity also has tremendous implications since the subject may be free to rewrite himself without the constraints of physical laws.  Both POV and singularity are supported by a Möbius strip topology since the Möbius strip allows one to discuss the nature of language in psychoanalysis and cybernetics, specifically, the immediacy between signifiers in human and machine; their souls are entwined but the connections do not appear to have any length. I would like to consider this topology in an effort to modify Lacan’s discourse of the Analyst.  By replacing the master signifier in his formula with Hayles’s flickering signifier of cyberspace one arrives at a “proof” for hypertext’s heuristic capacity; the proof, in turn, ultimately rests upon a Möbius foundation.  Another way to state this idea is that the post-poststructuralist nature of the flickering signifier as well as the posthuman amalgam of self and cyberspace yields change; the subject may better alter a signifier that is that much more removed from its signified, but in time only.  A closer look at what is meant here by “post-poststructuralist” will help us.