Perfect communication (or “perfect communicators”) may not even recognize imperfect communication as communication at all; it is perceived or interpreted as the absence of communication. Phallogocentric (i.e., masculinist, objectivist, unilinear) communication, then, is constructed, to varying degrees, as present, while all other forms of communication are constructed as absent. Irigaray writes, “Contradictory words seem a little crazy to the logic of reason, and inaudible for him who listens with ready-made grids, a code prepared in advance” (1469). Different modes of communication have different logics, and feminists who have found classical, Aristotelian logic uninspiring or even oppressive have often chosen to experiment with alternate logics. Experimentation and innovation often then lead to calls for pedagogical reform. As Lunsford remarked to Anzaldua, “the logical has had a stranglehold on the teaching of writing. You have to start with A and end with Z. You can’t start with Q” (“Toward” 24). In hypertext, of course, one is free to start and end anywhere.