In a hypertextual space, the Aristotelian logic of noncontradiction is radically subverted. Hypertext foregrounds contradiction, border crossing, and perspectival pluralism. Analogously, Luce Irigaray claims that women “desire at the same time nothing and everything” (1470). This apparently illogical, contradictory process is, Irigaray claims, “the multiple nature of female desire” (1470). As an analogue to female desire, a single hypertext often harbors a number of contradictory texts. In like manner, Laura Sullivan argues that the “multivocality and fragmentation made possible by hypertext [. . .] enable the hypertext creator to foreground the different parts of her self and to document the contradictions within which females in our culture live” (37). Contradiction and fragmentation, then, are accepted as facts of life, as well as inherent features of the multiple text. Contradiction need not be erased in the name of perfect communication.