Perspectives on the Experience


The Blue Girl Speaks
Angeline V. Kapferer x Mystique

Working with disability studies and feminist/gender studies in context with my English major has enabled me to recognize and familiarize myself with the unfamiliar. My recent engagement in the area of disability studies has broadened my scope to be more inclusive. I am careful to always recognize the importance of including disability when discussing how oppression and social construction work in terms of gender, age, race, and class. The exceptionalities of disability were recognized when I realized that my perspective on disability had flipped from being more passive to aggressive. I began seeing disability and disability theory played out everyday, is such places as in classes, at work and in the media. As I had seen before with daily manifestations of racism, sexism, ageism and classism, when most people are faced with disability it makes them resistant and nervous. This project and the English class "Disability in Drama and Performance Art" has assisted me in collectively developing my areas of study, political activism, and overall personal perspective. The fabulous performances viewed throughout the course have given me the opportunity to see how valuable art and activism are as one unit. This experience has furthered my engagement in terms of activism, awareness and intellectual development.


There/Not There
Ben M. Patton x Nightcrawler

Nicht were, cyberreader! I am Ben Pattonus x Nightcrawler. I enrolled in Professor Brueggemann x Professor X's class as a senior English major with minors in theatre and film studies, unclear of my own relationship to disability studies. I began to mutate into Ben Pattonus x Nightcrawler in cyberspace in response to a class member's web posting regarding what she felt was the class's dispassionate stance regarding the study of disability: "This is not just a class," she wrote, "this is personal!" The statement provided me with a moment of pause wherein I reflected on just how personal the class had become for me. I'd never been a part of a class where the students had such a vested interest in the coursework - for some of my classmates, the coursework WAS their life. And here I was, right in the thick of things. Each theme we discussed, from issues of access to constructions of disabled identities, intertwined with my own experiences and sense of self. So when Professor X asked me to help design this CoverWeb, I felt myself morphing into the persona of Nightcrawler. As Nightcrawler, I spent countless evenings and early morning hours coding HTML and revising text. As designer of this CoverWeb, I teleported myself (as Nightcrawler does) from frame to frame, image to image, page to page, dematerializing and reappearing, hedging, bobbing, and weaving in cyberspace as I do in my personal life. As Nightcrawler would say, Nicht were! I was not! I was.


Sum, Sum, Sum, Sum, Sum: Some Experience!
Brenda Jo Brueggemann x Professor X

Five of us added together have made something approximating "whole" here. A grand sum. I, for one, am still figuring out what I learned from the Fall 2001 "Disability in Drama and Performance Art" course we shared. Doing this web-text together helped crystallize - although not necessarily clarify - some things about that experience for me. Most of all, I'm convinced now more than ever how very exceptional that everyday class experience was, even in my own 19 years of teaching. We all took a lot of risks; exceptionality was the "norm." Packaging together the range of perspectives represented here was, in itself, a sizeable sum: one tenured (hard-of-hearing) professor; two undergraduate English majors with impressive backgrounds studying folklore/performance, queer theory, feminist theory; one M.A. student with a degree in law and a passion for all things liberal and radical; one Ph.D. student with hard-core critical theory at her ever-evolving center. All the other students in the course factor significantly as well - like free radicals floating throughout our text, anchoring us in some places, pushing us off shores in others. Our powers are increased to the nth degree by their presence as well. Some multiplication, and yet some subtraction too, as we worked to divide the labor, add up the whole.

The course itself is still being consumed. Ben and Angeline, the two undergraduates, will present on their projects at an upcoming "Multiple Perspectives on Disability" conference in mid-April along with about six others from the class. (See: http://ada.osu.edu/Conference%202002%20announcement.htm). Wendy and Marian, the two graduate students, will also present at that conference in another session (and will help facilitate the undergraduate student session). Wendy and Marian and I are working on a much longer essay about the course for an edited collection forthcoming from SUNY Press, and in that piece we explore the "radical" potential of teaching and learning about disability in language and literature classrooms. Our warrants for these claims in this essay comes largely (although not exclusively) from the experience of this course. We also hope to present on this essay in progress at the 2002 Modern Language Association convention in New York City.

As for the web-text project itself: it became, as these things usually do, far more consuming and interesting then we had even originally imagined as we kept engaging it. Ben was a student who had, of his own admission, slightly resisted the course in the beginning - unable to imagine where and how he might "fit" in ideas about disability and performance. But then he began performing disability, his own exceptionalities becoming everyday too, when he suddenly saw disability constructed everywhere in his favorite comics, The X-Men. So it was that Ben's own project, built with his sophisticated web-design skills, became a kind of plus-sign center of our summative equation in putting together this piece; his is the operative function. Angeline and Marian provide the materials to sum together - theirs are exceptional examples of projects that allowed students to locate and expand their own interests and to factor in some creativity as well. Angeline combines queer and feminist analysis on top of disability perspectives to look at the "body" of Julian/Dolphin/Trahan's performance art and written work. Marian re-encounters Lacan and her long-standing critical engagement with medicine in her hypertext poem project. Wendy sums - dividing, multiplying, adding, even subtracting quite effectively the whole range of all the final projects in the class - and in doing so, gets to lean hard on her strong critical and theoretical bent and to play out multiple possibilities in the categories she composes, an act Wendy performs (and has performed before) in remarkably personal and professional ways.

Me? I write the whole equation here on the board.


More Human Than Human
Marian E. Lupo x Mastermind

Greetings, cyberreader! I am Marian E. Lupo x Mastermind, a variation of Marian Lupous x specious and Mastermindus mutabilis. As Marian Lupous x hybrida, I began my studies with the visionary Professor Brueggemannus x Professor X in Spring 2001 as a graduate student in the English Department at The Ohio State University (http://www.english.ohio-state.edu/site_index.html). (When the student is ready, the teacher appears.) Foreseeing the space-shifting potential inherent in Marian E. Lupous x hybrida, Professor X encouraged me, in my hybrida form, to enroll in English 576, The Performance of Disability (http://www.cohums.ohio-state.edu/english/people/Brueggemann.1/562cCourse_web_site/
English_562C_course_info.htm
), as an independent study. Through this course, supplement by additional readings and discussion with Professor X, I not only began to understand the intersections among performance art, theories of performance, and the construction of disability, but I also began to learn how to use my own mutant powers.

My immersion in this material was deep. Through the course developed by Professor X, I worked with, ate with, met with, and learned with a virtual and somatic wealth of disabled/disability studies artists, scholars, and students in the company of my classmates, all mutating as we learned, and most of us in varying stages of temporary ablebodiedness and ablemindedness. I began to surface and make some of this material my own at the end of the quarter through my final project, a hypertext poem entitled "The Pronounce the Time of Death." http://www.cohums.ohio-state.edu/english/people/
Brueggemann.1/studentwebs/01au08146/marianlupo/
. The context for this poem appears elsewhere in this cybertextual space.

As a former space-shifter in this class (student/graduate student/teacher), I was called upon by Professor X to exercise my developing mutant powers by coordinating the production of this webtext. I then began, through cyber and somatic dialogue with the X-people, to change shape from Marian E. Lupous x hybrida to Mastermindus mutabilis. In this form, I shared my work, offered my encouragement, and monitored deadlines. We were already a densely connected community through the leadership of Professor X, and we became more connected as we took risks with our ideas and placed trust in each other in this collaborative effort. As I mutated into the Mastermindus mutabilis form, I took advantage of Mastermind's psionic ability to cast illusions as I projected confidence and mastery. But this, dear cyberreader, was only one of many illusions that through repetition "seem" to become certainties - that through repetition, allowed me to claim the cyberform in which I now appear.


From the Outside Looking Inside Out
Wendy L. Chrisman x Wolverine/Psylocke


My experience in Brenda Brueggemann's Fall 2001 "Disability in Drama and Performance Art" course was rather voyeuristic. Since this was an apprenticeship for me, I functioned as neither teacher nor student, and so I often sat on the periphery, eavesdropping on conversations. Throughout the course I listened to students move from talking privately about the ways in which the course and material troubled them to later publicly troubling categories of representations of disability. And when I sensed a lull, in both online and class discussions, I would insert myself as either a catalyst or a critic into these conversations. The most significant threads of conversation were about the ways in which disability gets dichotomized, that there is a long-standing trend of seeing disability texts and performances as either stories of inspiration, of the disabled "overcoming" disability, or as soapboxes endorsing the whiny "pity me because I am disabled" platform. While the actual articulation of this trend in this class came from Brenda, Marian, and me, the students generally were complicit in trying to position themselves within this dichotomy, consciously or not. While some were almost comfortable falling into the convention of playing both the inspiration and pity cards, other students really struggled with finding ways to see these disability texts and performances beyond this dichotomy, to understand them for what they are: representations of identity which need to be engaged in some critical and theoretical ways (and places) the same way other identity categories such as race, class, and gender are within the academic community. These discussions illuminated my own perspectives of and positioning in the class in that I became increasingly aware of being caught in the middle of being both and neither teacher nor student, and of having an academic and personal investment in Disability Studies. As students became more comfortable with talking about representations of disability and even what might constitute a disability, a sense of security developed which invited quite a few "coming out" stories. "I have a disabled friend/relative" and "my own experiences with disability" narratives were woven into our discussions and many of us, myself included, had to make choices regarding what to disclose about ourselves and our relation to disability and why. Teaching a subject or material that is very close to you personally can be difficult because there seems to be more at stake when students respond to, critique, and criticize the work. When students do understand, when they "get" the critical intersections of a text or discussion, it can be very validating. When they offer only ad hominem attacks or generic disdain for a text or author, it can be difficult to find the distance between oneself and the work in order to respond objectively to the student. Since Brenda, Marian, and I are coming from a background in Disability Studies, with personal and professional investments in this area, I was aware of both a tension and profound interest on our parts in the ways in which students responded to the course and the material we covered. Since disability was a somewhat new category for these students, and the ways in which we discussed disability were surely new, watching (or listening to) them explore these issues was for me both intriguing and unsettling, yet it also marked a moment of hopefulness about the ways in which disability will be discussed in the future.