The allusion, an exertion of my accruing literary knowledge, is both excessive and out of place. The conclusion, while connecting the opening allusion with the argument, fails to adequately summarize my argument. As for the syntactical constructions, I cram sentences full of information , I overuse conjunctive adverbs , and I show a lack of MLA knowledge. References are not correct. Also, my word choice is at times cliché and repetitive.                                                         The next paper, “One for All and All for One”, takes a quasi-New-Historicist approach to John Stuart Mill, Robert Browning, and Matthew Arnold.  The paper relies too much on the writers’ texts to be considered a true New-Historicist paper.  I like this paper because the discourse arises from my analysis, yet it has less subjectivity than the previous paper.  The paper compares and contrasts the three writers’ ideologies within the context of the Victorian Age.