|
|
|
|
Overview |
|
Development |
|
Case Study |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. “To Die, to Sleep—to Sleep, Perchance to
Dream: Imagery of the Christian View of Death in Jacob’s Ladder” |
|
II. “Truth
is in the Eye of the Beholder” |
|
III. A
History of Teaching the English Language |
|
|
|
|
In categorizing my unit & lesson
plans, I have separated the various modes of English Language Arts. The intention is solely organizational,
for all the plans incorporate several of the different modes. Although there are less than ten plans
included below, I plan on using this portfolio as an archive for future
plans. |
|
Composition Language |
|
|
|
Literature Speaking & Listening |
|
|
|
Viewing/ Reading |
|
Visually Representing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One for All and All for One |
|
The Victorians believed social progress
was determined by he effort of the individual. More specifically, Victorian John Stuart Mill thought it
depended upon a society’s commitment to the freedom of the individual. If individuals are forced to conform to
custom, tradition, or an established institution, then society will become
stagnant. Also, Mill believed a
progressive and hopeful future comes from the individual aspiring to
transcend the past. Reliance on the
past will retard society through inactivity of the individual. Mill hopes that if the individual has
the will and ability to develop his or her talents, breaking away from
institutions of the past, then society will progress. Robert Browning tempers Mill’s
idealistic hopes of individual freedom:
he concurred that social progress rests on allowing for individual
liberties; however, he warned that social progress occurs only when the
individual utilizes his or her energy for societal not personal gain. |
|
|
|
|
|
He reasons that everything new or
original has no past. Something
cannot exist before it is created.
Thus, breeding with static practices will not conceive any new
idea. Unfortunately, according to
Mill, the English people will fall into a “collective mediocrity,” as long
as they conform to the narrow and inadequate scope of these
institutions. Therefore, Mill
believes a custom-bound society is in direct conflict with progress. Mill’s ideology, characteristic of the
Victorian Age, not only points out the problem, he offers a solution. He asserts that a society can remain
progressive as long as it values individuality. For, as Mill said, “The initiation of all wise or noble
things, comes and must come from individuals; generally at first from some
one individual.” If the individual
is allowed to progress into the future, then society shares its sons’ and
daughters’ achievements. Robert Browning transitions between Mill’s hope
for a prosperous future and Arnold’s lamentations over a lost past. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Prior, a symbol for custom, forces
Lippo to conform, severing the possibilities of progress. Browning explicitly agrees with Mill
about the degenerative qualities of repressing the individual. Yet, where Mill fails to address the
dangers of the excesses of individual liberties, Browning succeeds. In many of his dramatic monologues, the
reader discovers individuals who have personal freedom. Contrariwise to Mill’s positive outlook,
these men show no promise of contributing to society. In these poems, Browning is saying not
only does society need to place an emphasis on the individual; the
individual must place emphasis on society.
Although one may have personal freedom, he or she must use that
freedom for the sake of society, not the individual. If not, then anything the individual has
to offer society will be used to serve solely the individual. Lastly, the true road between Mill’s
hope and Arnold’s dejection can be found in Browning’s Childe Roland To The
Dark Tower Came.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He believed personal liberty might lead
to anarchy because “[f]reedom…was one of those things which we worshipped
in itself, without enough regarding the ends for which freedom is to be
desired.” Having a society full of
Browning’s proud dukes, greedy bishops, and controlling lovers would not
exactly bring about progress. What
really bothers Arnold is the feeling of insignificance brought on by social
progress. Arnold argues that the
social changes, brought on by the purposeless individualistic approach to
progress, have left the individual alone and, “wandering between two
worlds, one dead, the other powerless to be born.” The Christian cultural bond was
beginning to break apart due to scientific advances. This bond had given and connected every
man with the same purpose. Arnold
did not lament over losing the specifics of the Christian religion;
instead, he was dejected over losing a purpose that could be shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Tie that Binds |
|
Richard Fogle confesses that Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short story Young
Goodman Brown is a seemingly simple
story leading the protagonist on a short journey, wherein he must face a
crisis in the forest, when upon completion, he proceeds home “a changed
man”. (Fogle/p.22). This skeletal framework of the story
seems simple enough for the reader to comprehend. So, why are there so many different analysis’, many of which
are violently conflictive, on this
short, simple story? How can such a
basic story inspire one critic to parade Young Goodman Brown as, “the
achieve[ment]…[of the] highest art”, while it ignites another critic to set
it aflame as a, “failure of the artist’s vital responsibility toward his
material?” (Fogle/p.32:
Humma/p.431). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the man is lying in bed dreaming of the
king of the beasts, his beautiful friend the marlin has been reduced to
mere harbor trash:“That afternoon there was a party of tourists at the
Terrace and looking down in the water among the empty beer cans and dead
barracudas a woman saw a great long white spine with a huge tail at the end
that lifted and swung with the tide….” (126). The tourists, upon inquiring
about the remnants of the great fish, are erroneously, through the loss of
translation, informed that it was a shark.
Both the old man and the fish's existence remain anonymous to the outside
world. Their great epic battle that
nearly killed both of them left no impression on the world. It was just another example of man’s
inability to control the world around him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptive Writing: Paper Bag |
|
Descriptive Writing: Sensory |
|
|
|
|
|
The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe |
|
The Chosen |
|
|
|
|
Thematic Unit:
Source of Truth |
|
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|