
Within the Learning
Community
Considering transactions between writer and
"audience" brings us to that important learning
dimension where rhetorical knowledge is formed in student writers
as their intended meaning intersects with their readers'
constructed meanings through the mediation of the text.
Shifting our gaze from internal transactions to
community transactions, we progress from the personal
fruits of composing to the wider marketplace of rhetorical
commerce. As writers turn outward to test their intentions
against the understandings (constructed meanings) of their
readers, the class becomes a learning community. All involved in
the class can contribute in some way to building knowledge and
skill in each another--as critical but sympathetic readers, as
models for emulation, or as "friendly rivals" engaged
in a common task. But since novice writers usually need
consistent support and guidance to understand writing goals, to
learn strategies, to develop accurate language style, and to
become effective judges of rhetorical situations, the teacher's
role in class dynamics remains crucial--teachers are agents of
exchange, both in relation to the concepts of the writing being
attempted, the procedural steps of a project or assignment, and
in shaping the emerging texts.
Looking at synchronous conferences as primary
sites for teaching/learning transactions, we can see patterns of
interactions involving teacher and students through a lens that
focuses on transactional poles and the directions or
"vectors" of communications between them.
- "One-way"
transactions include those
originating with the teacher's intentional setting of
concepts and activities in motion.
- "Two-way" transactions then carry on the momentum of
learning--questions, clarifications, attempt followed by
attempt to build meaning on the student's part, fueled by
the teacher's efforts to sustain and guide learning.
- "Multi-party"
transactions occur among clusters
of discussants where the teacher's role is significant
but not dominant; in these transactions, peers make
serious attempts to understand and challenge each other,
offer encouragement, suggestions, and so on.
Of course, all transactions may in some sense
be thought of as "two-way"--between the
"writer" or originator and "audience" or
receiver. But in the dynamics of teaching, and for our current
purposes, using the teacher's position as a starting point
enables us to understand more usefully the group dynamics of the
class community, and its impact on language and learning
transactions.
In
the following discussions, I will show how these transactional
vectors were manifested in actual synchronous discussions.
|
 |