Student Responses to HyperRhetoroids, Fall 1998 From Student OLRs, Course Evaluations, and personal e-mails |
||
Comments from student OLRsI have included a large portion of the observations from Student A, who broke down the observations into the various strands of the course; that seemed a useful way to show the OLR and one of the approaches students can take in presenting their work. The subsequent examples are less exhaustive. I have tried to represent a variety of the kinds of observations and responses one gets in an OLR. Please keep in mind that the writing requirement for observations is quite informal.) Student A About Reading and Research I was reading the Joyce articles and there was a very profound statement in there. Something about hypertext doing your imagination's job by filling in visuals and voices that the reader used to come up with on their own. I thought how sad that was initially. I tend to write by painting with words. I have a visual image in my head and I let other people see it through my words. This is quite challenging and I love writing in this manner. But then I saw how pictures could enhance your words at the same time. They could add more to vague words. You could make words so vague that without the picture there was no meaning, but with the picture there was. Kind of like a title that completes the essence of poem and states the real intention. About Writing: I think that the organization
of my paper is going good. I had a hard time figuring out how I would
put the different concepts of personae shifting together in one paper,
but I fixed that by taking out one of the topics and by trying to
keep a general theme running through all of the different aspects
of personae shifting. Drawing the maps of links was really hard, but then I thought of an idea. I printed out the text for each box and then I cut it into strips and arranged it all over my floor and found key words that connected and it became a lot easier. Story Space is so much better than html for hypertext. It's much easier to organize with Story Space. I guess I tried to reconstruct a paper version of Story Space, but it was highly inferior to the computer version. Technology is good for writing. On Collaboration I really liked doing the peer reviews. Getting the feedback was very helpful. Reading people's papers taught me how to see mistakes in my own paper and made me look at organization more closely. It was much easier to see other people's mistakes, knowing that I wouldn't have to fix them. The information I got from other people was also very helpful. I have a lot of work to do to fix this paper, but at least I know which direction to head in now. We've all been sharing our work with one another in class. It's really neat to see what they've done. They are doing a lot of the graphics and I'm doing a lot of the writing. I guess we're all capitalizing on our strengths. I'm really impressed with a lot of their work. It made me think about my color scheme. I don't want to seem to boring compared to them. On Technology But I was really proud of myself because I figured out how to get people to e-mail me from my page. Plus I linked to the UT web page. I linked to other pages of mine. Then I also pulled a background off of the web, saved it as a "gif" file, and put it on my webpage. Making web pages is so easy with Claris. I love this. Reflections Reading Mothering, and Victory
Garden
Reading "Lord Berleigh's Kiss" Project 2 Student C Student D While working on project 2 proposal, I learned some new material about the writing and reading of hypertext. The three articles that I read for the project proposal helped clear up the new questions that I had about hypertext. On the 17th we used the interchange program. This program allows for people to talk to each other within seconds. It was very helpful with my project because I could get other people's point of view on the subject of traditional writing vs. hypertext. This also helped in narrowing down the subject for my project. At the start of the course (Part
A.2): Observations Student F Observations: I just got finished taking a look at Victory Garden. The Bad thing about it was that someone had already told me what the Story was about. I think Story is more useful to organize and outlines instead of the use to create stories. I had trouble with Victory Garden just mainly because I was just clicking without actually reading what was really going on. I just wanted to see what was at the end. In over all I liked Victory Garden more that Mothering, mainly just because I didn't understood the poems and literature of mothering. Also I knew more how Story Space really works compare when I first tried it with Mothering. My greatest fear upon signing up for this class was doing the homepage part. I guess it's just sitting down and fooling around with the tool bars. I'm actually starting to enjoy this class. The cool thing is that I'm seeing the progress I have acquire as the days go by. At the start of the course (Part
A.2): Observations: Reading Judith Kerman's Mothering
(in Storyspace) So far, my interpretation of hypertext is that it allows flexibility and connections to other pieces of information. I thought it was interesting sort of evaluating ourselves in the areas of: reading, writing, speaking and listening, and technology. When I read and write, I have a tendency to evaluate myself when I'm doing it. However, actually thinking about it and writing down what I thought was something I had never done before. I thought I would go back and try to read "Mothering" again and see if I could understand it better given the information I learned from the articles, as well as, what I've learned in class. I felt I could read it better given what I know hypertext is about. I could now understand why she has such random thoughts. I guess like the material has been telling us, it is up to the reader to make sense of it……takes a lot of practice though, at least with Mothering. I also went back and looked at some links that had some hyperdocuments on them. I think I could appreciate more what the author was trying to do and I was able to understand them a little bit better the second time around. It is still kind of tough with some authors. Project 2 Proposal At the start of the course (Part
A.2): Observations: I got Victory Garden today. It is making more sense to me than Mothering did, probably because I'm more familiar with what was going on. I just keep following the same links. That is the traditional way to read a book and is what I am used to. Iíím scared to click on a link because I don't want to get lost. I guess I need to open my mind up here and not be scared. Who cares if it makes sense, right? Well I turned in my paper last Thursday. I was so relieved to have it done finally. We took home our peers papers to critique. Now we have to rewrite the papers some according to what our peers said. That kind of sucks. This week we are focusing on our midterm OLR. It is due on Friday. I'm having a lot of trouble with it because we have to convert it to hypertext and put it on our web page. I have no idea how to do this. My classmate, Aalok is going to help me out. Thank God for him. I have the organization down, just getting it on the web page is the hard part. I wish things like this was explained to us more. Instead, we have to figure it out on our own. A response to the course: This class is intimidating first coming into it. You do have to work hard and keep up with what is going on in order to be successful. I honestly dislike the amount of self-exploration that is required for this class. However, the lack of guided instruction and over-abundance of forced, sink or swim, discovery has developed my confidence and independence in my use of Storyspace and Claris Homepage. I'm sorry to note that my confidence and independence have grown at the cost of my knowledge and understanding of the material covered in this class. |
||
Comments from the anonymous Course EvaluationsAt the end of each semester, UT and the English department provide anonymous evaluation forms for the students to complete. These forms include a section for additional comments; the following comments come from those forms. Obviously, not all of the students chose to write comments, because all but one of the comments are included here. The exception was an inappropriate commentary about the institution itself and did not address the nature of the class or my teaching. |
||
Runnion's "teaching" style is quite different from what I've been exposed to in my academic career. His class is tough, but I definitely got something out of it. This guy cares about his students, Not like your other professors at UT, Who just do not give a damn. All they are interested with is trying to fail you so that there are less people at UT. [sic] Overall, I think the course is setup in a different way that allows for the student to grow at their own rate. Also, I feel the OLR is a better way of evaluating the grade of the student. One suggestion is to start project 4 after project 2. It feels like too much time has been wasted between project 2 & 4. Thanks for the interesting & different approach to teaching! there doesn't seem to be enough instruction in the course; but at the end of the class it seems to become more of a teach yourself class. I've learned a lot just by relying on myself and not the teacher. [sic] great course, I think the teaching strategy of throwing students into the course load is an excellent to optimize learning and retention. An by allowing students to pursue what topics they choose it keeps them interested. [sic] this class was beyond frustrating; however, this is the most fun I've ever had in a class at UT. I have learned so much. I've also found a new medium of creative expression. Hypertext has improved my writing dramatically (creatively + scholarly). I will really miss doing this next semester. I want to say thanks for the class. I know that I had my share of complaints, but most of them stem from the lack of brain stimulation in other classes. It had been a long time since I truly had to think and work in class. It's easy to look back and say that I enjoyed the class. |