The Products |
|
Project One |
|
1. | Although the students could have converted their Storyspaces into HTML format, most of them did not, and the products are not available to show. The purpose of the project was really to give them an opportunity to work in a topographic style of writing, rather than the usual formal (and primarily linear) essay style they had been using most of their lives in school. |
2. | A few of them demonstrated that they had a certain flair for creative writing, and most of them attempted creative writing rather than an essay. Two students did attempt a type of personal history and both were interesting, though sparse. Only one student actually continued working on his Storyspace after the class time allotted for it (only two weeks at the beginning of the semester); the others probably didn't convert them to HTML due more to time constraints than a lack of interest. |
3. | Because I had planned from the beginning to allow some students to work on a creative "instantiation" of hyperfiction, I used the work in Storyspace as an indicator for which students might make the best candidates for a creative work. |
Project Two |
|
4. | This was the most traditional of the essays, though ultimately it was rewritten as a web-based essay. Since I use a variation on the portfolio system, students were able to continue working on the assignment up to the end of the semester, integrating what they had learned over the whole semester as part of the essay if they chose to. Some did very little in the way of rewriting (and this was reflected in their final course grade); others worked very hard to create a new essay meant for the web. |
5. | We spent some time discussing issues of style and design, and several of the essays reflect those discussions and concerns. Because UT-Austin's freshman English class focuses on argumentation and rhetorical analysis, I didn't spend a lot of time discussing these issues with them, though in retrospect I probably should have spent more. |
Project Three |
|
6. | I had begun the semester asking the students to search the WWW for articles about and instances of hypertext literature and to post them to the "Add Links" page once a week. At the time Project Three started, most of them had not done much but began in earnest at this point. The advantage to this, of course, was to reduce the time any one student needed to search and to encourage collaboration with their peers. Because they were supposed to annotate each new link they added, the annotated bibliography was an extension of this activity. Most of the students caught on to the idea very quickly and had the most difficulty with either finding a correspondent or developing good questions to send to their correspondent. |
Project Four |
|
7. | The culminating project was the most difficult of all, on many levels. The students not only had to develop a group topic, but break each topic down into component parts for their own individual contributions. Aside from their difficulty with thinking on these levels, the technological imperatives became even more complex. They had to discuss, negotiate, and, finally, approve an organizational strategy for their web site as well as make design decisions that would carry across each person's individual pages and make the site a "whole." |
8. | Only a few of the students had prior web page experience, so most had to work very hard to learn how to accomplish the design and structure they decided upon. Although I had recommended that their annotated bibliographies become a part of the site, not all the groups accomplished this. Still, they did an admirable job on the whole. |
9. | The creative writing group was charged with not simply creating a piece of fiction, but an instantiation of what they and the other groups had learned about hypertext literature from, especially, a structural point of view. Their initial proposal was fairly sophisticated and the difficulty of carrying out some of their ideas proved a bit too much. Still, they managed to put together a piece that showed many of the concepts the class had discovered. |
![]() ![]() |