Although there was definitely a "collective sense of the experience" (Faigley, 198), looking back on the course, I'm not quite satisfied with the project.

Carol Stabile, drawing on the work of Rosemary Hennessy, outlines a recent shift "from feminist politics grounded in the question 'What is to be done?' to a feminist politics rooted in the more passive and individualistic 'Who am I?'" (151). Have I succeeded in encouraging my students to answer the latter question at the expense of the former? If so, how can I redesign these projects such that the former question is given more weight? For now, I wonder, what will my students do with the transformations they experienced while designing and building these hypertexts?

back