In a space titled "anti-architecture" Kolb writes, "We need forms of hypertext writing that are neither standard linear or hierarchical unities nor simple juxtaposition." In other words, we do need a form; philosophy cannot be simply a willy-nilly array of free associated texts. Nor should hypertext, a medium which gives breath to the corpus of post-modern sensibilities of what a text is or can be, be confused as necessarily meaning that because it is non-linear that it is meaningless.

Hypertext will, I think, alter our understanding of language, meaning-making, argument, and philosophy as thoroughly as jet aircraft have altered our sense of travel, physical space, and the size of the planet. (The usual analogy, so usual as to be cliche, is to compare computer technology, or some subset of it [like hypertext], to the difference the automobile made over the horse in our culture and lives, but what Kolb's pushing at in his work, what he suggests, will be more of a departure, ultimately, than even that.)

Return to where you departed from.

Return to start of review of Socrates in the Labyrinth

Address your comments to Nick Carbone at