kairos >>
1.1 >> PixRhet >>
... an interesting list of
educational practices that we abhorred.
Richard Selfe
This past October 9th, I was introducing some new graduate
students and faculty to MOO technology by having a discussion with some
volunteers from around the net. We began by revisiting the issue of
whether technology, in particular networked communication technologies,
could really solve educational problems. An answer to that question was
deferred until we could define what we meant by "the real problems of
education." We generated what I thought was an interesting list of
educational practices that we abhorred.
AheaP says, "[T]here are ways of making this technology stuff just as
effective as f-2-f without making it an assembly line."
AheaP: [I abhor] stuff that removes human interaction.
Lu says, "I abhor a talking head on TV."
LindaR says, "assembly line, non-collaborative, fill-in-the-blanks ... and
more."
Lu says, "I abhor a non-humanitarian course without a real-time
conferencing component."
AheaP abhors drill-n-practice.
KarlaK abhors decontextualized learning
Snickity says, "I, in fact, would find any course detestable that did not
include student teacher contact. I mean real-time contact."
winston says, "And what kinds of teaching do we abwhore? How do we
maintain virtue in this process of moving to the hot new technology?"
Barry says, "I abhor a course that does not encourage critical, witty writing."
rselfe says, "I abhor teaching that assumes that the students have little
to add to the content of the course."
Each of these abhorrent practices creates what I would call an educational
vacuum that we might use technologies, defined broadly, to fill. The
Kairos project, I believe, can provide some remedy for several of these
abhorrent practices, but I will focus briefly on the last one: the
educational practices based on the assumption that "students" have nothing
to add to the content of their own education.
Kairos provides some rememdy
by providing interactive publications in a hypertextual form that, in turn,
will allow readers to respond to the h-text, add value, emphasize useful
connections unnoticed by the original author, .... If the hard working
crew behind this project can keep the process of participation in the
Kairos h-texts open enough, the value added to each h-essay will come from
contributors based primarily on their effort and interests. The "student,"
the reader of the h-text, will add, that much more easily, to the knowledge
of the community. I want to participate in projects that encourage goals
of this sort.
Send mail to Richard Selfe
Back to the front of Pixelated Rhetorics
See Dean Fontenot's contribution
See Jeff Galin's contribution
vol. 1 Iss. 1 Spring 1996
|