[Home] [Portfolio Assessment] [LRO History and Philosophy] [LRO Components]
 
[Benefits and Differences] [Responses] [Responsibility]

 


LRO Objectives


 

The LRO information web site (in the "Teacher's Manual") suggests pre-defined course objectives; however, when setting up a new class, the objectives and their descriptions can be tailored to your individual class needs.

The objectives are divided into three areas of learning: course dimensions, components, and strands.

Below are explanations of each of the course dimensions; following each explanation is an explanation, by Dr. Syverson, of the pedagogical goals of the specific course dimensions.

Confidence and Independence

To comfortably work with technology and to create and present work with confidence, knowing the processes involved; to have the independence (along with feedback and suggestions from me) to take a chance and explore new terrains.

Dr. Syverson's description:


Confidence and independence in our own reading, writing, and thinking abilities. We see growth and development when learners' confidence and independence become coordinated with their actual abilities and skills, content knowledge, use of experience, and reflectiveness about their own learning. It is not a simple case of "more (confidence and independence) is better." The overconfident student who has relied on faulty or underdeveloped skills and strategies learns to ask for help when facing an obstacle; the shy student begins to trust her own abilities and begins to work alone at times, or to insist on presenting her own point of view in discussion. In both cases, students develop along the dimension of confidence and independence.
 

Skills and Strategies

To use what you learn in this class.

Dr. Syverson's description:


Specific skills and strategies involved in composing and communicating effectively, from concept to organization to polishing grammar and correctness, and including technological skills for computer communication. Skills and strategies represent the "know-how" aspect of learning. When we speak of "performance" or "mastery," we generally mean that learners have developed skills and strategies to function successfully in certain situations.

 

Knowledge and Understanding

To understand the writing and speaking processes through invention, organization, drafting, revision, editing, and presentation.

Dr. Syverson's description:


Knowledge and understanding refers to the "content" knowledge gained about new technologies, rhetoric, research methods, the topics we write about, the methods of organizing and presenting our ideas to others, and so on. Knowledge and understanding is the most familiar dimension, focusing on the "know-what" aspect of learning. What is "persona" in rhetoric? Where can I find reliable information on a particular topic? What is a "home page" on the World Wide Web? These are typical content questions.
 

Use of Prior and Emerging Experience

To value and build on the knowledge and the cultural and linguistic experiences you bring to the class.

Dr. Syverson's description:


The use of prior and emerging experience involves the ability to draw on our own experience and connect it to our work. A crucial but often unrecognized dimension of learning is the ability to make use of prior experience as well as emerging experience in new situations. It is necessary to observe learners over a period of time while they engage in a variety of activities in order to account for the development of this important capability, which is at the heart of creative thinking and its application. In predetermined learning situations we cannot discover just how a learner's prior experience might be brought to bear to help scaffold new understandings, or how ongoing experience shapes the content knowledge or skills and strategies the learner is developing.
 

Critical Reflection

To critically work through and evaluate arguments (yours, your peers, and others). You will write for multiple audiences and purposes. For yourselves, you will write to discover your own use and conceptions of language and to discover your own critical thoughts on a variety of subjects and activities. For others, you will write to inquire, persuade, convince, and negotiate. By reading and writing reflectively, you can develop the critical thinking skills necessary to have personal, social, and intellectual growth and economic and academic success

Dr. Syverson's description:


Reflection refers to our developing awareness of our own learning process, as well as more analytical approaches to reading, writing, and communication. When we speak of reflection as a crucial component of learning, we are not using the term in its commonsense meaning of reverie or abstract introspection. We are referring to the development of the learner's ability to step back and consider a situation critically and analytically, with growing insight into his or her own learning processes, a kind of metacognition. Learners need to develop this capability in order to use what they are learning in other contexts, to recognize the limitations or obstacles confronting them in a given situation, to take advantage of their prior knowledge and experience, and to strengthen their own performance.

 

The following are course components and strands as suggested by Dr. Syverson.

Note: the following are the course components and strands, which appear on my syllabus; I have slightly modified them.

4 components of CLASS:

Research

Assessment

Teaching

Learning  

 4 strands of work in CLASS:

Rhetoric  

Research

Technology

Collaboration

Course components are the general areas around which the class revolves; course strands are more specific areas around which class activities and assignments revolve. As a teacher, you can enter descriptions of each component and strand when you set up your course.

The course dimensions, components, and strands encourage learning and reflection by highlighting the complex, mutli-dimension components of learning. When students argue for their course grade (Part C) and reflect on and summarize their learning (Part B), students must relate their learning to these course objectives and specifically discuss the relationship(s). As Dr. Syverson states in the "Teacher's Manual,"

Learning occurs across complex dimensions which are interrelated and interdependent. Learning theorists have argued that learning and development is not an assembly-line which can be broken down into discrete steps occurring with machine-time precision, but an organic process that unfolds along a continuum according to its own pace and rhythm. Within the Learning Record process, the teacher and student are actively searching for, and documenting, positive evidence of student development across the five dimensions. These five dimensions [and course strands and components] cannot be 'separated out' and treated individually; they are dynamically interwoven and interdependent, and learners should expect to make progress across each.

The course dimensions, components, and strands are different than those of other portfolio models; many course objectives are very bland and narrow. For example:

Upon completing this course, you will be able to write papers for a specific audience; you will be able to write coherent, well-organized, and grammatically-correct papers that have strong introductions, conclusions, and thesis statements. 

The LRO and its objectives are different because

1) They are more defined and are not as vague/arbitrary. Even without any descriptions, these objectives are more personal and centered on learning and knowledge and not just on skills and products. They also provide students with a general, yet still specific (as compared with objectives of other courses), explanation of course expectations and goals. In fact, the LRO objectives are clearly stated (see Note 1) in terms that relate learning to (what many students call) "the real world."

While course objectives, such as the above, give students an adequate impression of the course content, they do not really spark enthusiasm or provide a connection to "the real world." The LRO objectives do, by focusing on skills and strategies (to use in the real world), knowledge, and personal growth (independence). In fact, the LRO objectives recognize the various facets of learning and life and the complexity of such. Furthermore, descriptions of course objectives can be tailored to course and student needs. In doing so, the course objectives become even more personal, and less arbitrary, and thus more engaging and applicable to students.

2) The LRO encourages consistent focus on the objectives; these objectives become a hub for learning. For example, in Parts B and C students are asked to focus on the course objectives and specifically relate them to their knowledge. In other words, the course objectives are not simply ideas mentioned on the first day of class, but hubs for forming connections and applying knowledge in "real-world" terms.

Note 1: Yet, they do so in a language that is easy for most students to comprehend (although some teachers, depending on the grade level, might need to explain 'rhetoric' and 'assessment').

Part A

[Home] [Portfolio Assessment] [LRO History and Philosophy] [LRO Components]
 [Benefits and Differences] [Responses] [Responsibility]