Creativity and Copyrightby Stephen FishmanCopyright © 1991 Nolo Press
This article originally appeared in the Nolo News. If you wish to post it on-line or otherwise distribute it, first read Nolo's copyright policy. See the end of the article for information about related products.
No message could be simpler, it seems, but there are often serious questions about what exactly it is that can't be used. |
|
Top | Next |
Ideas vs. ExpressionA copyright protects an author's tangible expression--the author's particular choice of words and the selection and arrangement of the material. It does not protect the ideas the author expressed. No one can claim an idea and prevent others from writing about it.This basic rule operates a little differently for works of fiction than for non-fiction, although the goal is the same: don't let authors impede the progress of knowledge by monopolizing ideas that should belong to everybody. |
Back | Next |
Side Bar--Copyright RightsCopyright is a federal law that gives authors control over their creations. The author has the exclusive right to determine who, if anyone, can make copies of a poem, book, article, essay, letter, marketing brochure or other work. Authors don't have to do a thing to get this right--it's automatic. The instant your pen, typewriter or printer produces something original--not copied from someone else--it is protected under the copyright laws.An author also has the exclusive right to:
|
Back | Next |
FictionIf you write a work of fiction--a play, novel, poem or short story, for example--your words can't be copied without violating your copyright.But the underlying idea--for instance, a police story or an unrequited romance--is not protected by copyright. Similarly, the central idea or theme of a novel or short story can be used by others without the copyright owner's permission. A fictional work's setting--for instance, romance on a French island in 1920--doesn't come within the copyright statute. Nor does the work's plot--the sequence of events by which the author expresses an idea--unless it is truly original. Very few plots are that original. For instance, if you write a novel about a spunky heroine who triumphs over adversity in the Civil War, you have the right to control your words but not the story line. Anyone else is free to write a novel with a similar character and plot. Many authors rebel at the idea that others can use their plot lines, but the alternative would let authors tie up basic plots for decades, to the detriment of the arts. Other aspects of fictional works that aren't subject to copyright protection are:
|
Back | Next |
Works in the Public DomainMaterial that is not protected by copyright is in the public domain--free for anyone to use without permission. The public domain includes:
|
Back | Next |
Non-fictionThe rules are a little different for non-fiction works, because it is harder to show that an author's expression in a non-fiction book was copied. Non-fiction works, by definition, deal with facts which themselves are not protected.Copyright does not protect facts that an author discovers in the course of research, even if an author spends considerable effort conducting the research. Nor does it protect the author's interpretation of facts--theories or hypotheses about what the facts show, or the book's physical and visual attributes, including choice of typeface style and size, spacing and juxtaposition of text and illustrations. But as long as the facts are described in a unique way, the expression will be protected even if the facts aren't. Scientists Stephen J. Gould and Lewis Thomas, for example, have written books about science whose language transcends the facts they are based on. The distinctive prose in their books receives far more protection than that of a run-of-the-mill scientific treatise. The more that writing transcends the mundane and purely functional, the more copyright protection it will receive. For instance, consider an unadorned factual account of Paul Revere's famous midnight ride during the Revolutionary War that contains the following: "On April 18, 1775, the Boston minutemen learned that the British intended to march on Concord with a detachment of 700 men. Paul Revere arranged for a signal to be flashed from the steeple of the Old North Church in Boston. Two lanterns would mean that the British were coming by water, and one, by land." Copyright would not be of much use to the author of this passage. If anyone else wrote a brief factual account of Paul Revere's ride, it would necessarily have to contain sentences looking very much like those in this paragraph. If the author sued, alleging a copyright violation, the law's policy against granting an author a monopoly over facts would mean that a court would likely rule that there was no copyright violation. In contrast, copyright would protect a highly creative work containing essentially the same facts about Paul Revere's ride. Consider this:
Listen, my children, and you shall hear
He said to his friend, "if the British march These stanzas were written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow over 100 years ago, and the copyright has expired, but let's pretend they were written just the other day. This verse conveys almost exactly the same facts as the paragraph above, but would be protected because the author's words are embellished and highly distinctive. The sequence of words is not dictated solely by the facts. It is the unique word sequence itself, not the facts, that is the work's main attraction. No one needs to copy this particular word sequence in order to convey the same facts or to write another work of fancy about Paul Revere's ride. A person who copied even the first two lines would probably be found to have infringed on the copyright in the poem. |
Back | Next |
Enforcing Copyright RightsThe fact that an author has the legal right to control a work isn't the end of the story, of course, as anyone who has used a VCR or a photocopy machine readily understands. Enforcing this right can be difficult.If someone violates (infringes) an author's rights under the copyright law, the author may sue in federal court, demanding compensation for economic loss and a stop to further harm. Unless the author has already taken certain steps, however, the lawsuit will likely cost far more than the author will win. To make a lawsuit economically feasible, the author must have:
|
Back | Top |
Side Bar--Types of Works Protected by CopyrightThis article discusses written works, but copyright also protects such creative expressions as:
Related Products:BooksBooks with DisksThe above links are connected to Nolo's on-line store where you will find a detailed description of each product.Nolo's Home Page | Store | How to Reach Us | Legal Encyclopedia |