External Links for "One Department's Guidelines for Evaluating
Computer-Related Work"
art2.html
- The link to ITC & CCCCCCC Project to Establish
Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure, and Academic Recognition
of Those Working with Computer Technology, which
originally pointed to http://www.daedalus.com/promo/promo.html,
showed the work that NCTE and CCCC had done on
creating guidelines for evaluating computer-related work for
tenure and promotion. This link was included to show how little
progress had been made by major organizations in the discipline
towards arriving at formal evaluation guidelines.
problem.html
- The link to Archive Name: rhetnet_promo, which
originally pointed to
http://www.daedalus.com/promo/rhetnet_promo/rhetnet_promoDate.html
showed a transcript of a discussion on Rhetnet-L (June 8-30, 1995).
Several postings to the discussion, especially the posting by Eric Crump
that I refer to in my text, clearly articulated the relationship
between quality and evaluation in computer-related work in English
studies. This link was included to draw the reader's attention
to a particularly strong discussion of matters of technology,
tenure, and promotion.
tengdl6.html
- The link to Evaluating Computer-Related Work in the
Modern Languages: Draft Guidelines Prepared by the MLA
Committee on Computers and Emerging Technologies
in Teaching and Research, which originally pointed to
http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/mla.guidelines.html,
showed the text of the MLA Guidelines. The link was included to
give direct credit to the source and to keep this article linked
to any future revision of the guidelines available at this site.
- The link to Modern Language Association of America
Statement on Computer Support, which originally pointed to
http://perseus.holycross.edu/ITC/MLA.html,
showed the text of the MLA Statement. The link was included to
give direct credit to the source and to keep this article linked
to any future revision of the guidelines available at this site.
virtues.html
- The link to Archive Name: rhetnet_promo, which
originally pointed to
http://www.daedalus.com/promo/rhetnet_promo/rhetnet_promoDate.html
showed a transcript of a discussion on Rhetnet-L (June 8-30, 1995).
Several postings to the discussion entertain the question of what
kinds of supporting material tenure and promotion committees will
be willing to consider in evaluating online activities. This
link was included to draw the reader's attention
to a particularly strong discussion of how we might evaluate
online work for tenure and promotion purposes.
E-mail: seth@bradley.bradley.edu
A>